Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles Just Showed That Playcalling and Offensive Personnel Can Win a Super Bowl


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

Yea there was a huge defensive play they had near the end but most of that game was on the fact that the Eagles scored well enough to beat the Patriots while their defense was getting beat like a drum for alot of the game.

Eagles totally transformed their team in a fairly short amount of time after they had the fiasco with Chip Kelley . They got better coaching staff, and very key was last offseason where they picked up two very good WRs in Alshon Jeffrey and Torrey Smith. They changed the role of Nelson Agahlor to the slot which better suited his skills. And they traded for Jay Ajayi and got Legarret Blount in the offseason. Its just continuing to prove that change is nessasary to win the big one. 

Alot of people here are a liltle confused/worried about the future considering are getting a new owner, new OC, and great players are declaring its their last season in 2018 (Kalil, Davis) while our other franchise players are aging quickly (Greg will be 33, Stew will be 31, Cam will be 29 , and Luke will be 27) . 

I think I feel fairly positive now, but its really up to how either Hurney/new GM does the offseason and draft. But I know things can chance very quickly , either by draft (ex. Saints), or free agency/coaching changes (ex. Eagles, Rams) .  Here's to hoping we can get a player like Mike Wallace and another good WR.  And either get a good young power back. Keep in mind we can also trade for a player too. 

I'm feeling pretty confident about Norv Turner , I think we immediately see divdens getting paid by finally having a competent OC. I think having Byrd and Samuel healthy and getting someone like Wallace in here will be huge, and also Cam and CMC having an entire complete offseason as well . I think Turner is going to really know how to use CMC well and the dude will explode in his 2nd year, he'll get more outside runs and be featured heavily in the passing game. 

. I think the draft will be mostly used for defense to help us on the line and the secondary but I could be wrong. 

Overall I think we are due for a SB win and we're closer than alot of people think.  All it takes is one good offseason and a few good pieces added. Stay positive ladies and gentlemen..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole game also showed ground and pound is as archaic as it gets in today’s NFL.

Never did the run establish play-action. Everyone literally went straight to play-action passes and it worked because that’s how football actually works.

Today’s league is a passing league. And we’re about to fall behind because Rivera wants us to be 1st in time of possession instead of 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free Agent WRs of Note

  • Mike Wallace
  • Sammy Watkins
  • Allen Robinson
  • Donte Moncrief
  • Marquise Lee 
  • Michael Floyd
  • (Also could trade for a dude like Josh Gordon or Martvis Bryant )
  • (Landry isnt worth mentioning with his terrible salary # and he's not a deep threat by any means)

RBs : 

  • Legarret Blount
  • Isaiah Crowell
  • Jamaal Charles
  • Alfred Morris 
  • (pretty slim pickings RB wise, probably would have to draft one)

CBs:

  • Prince Amukamara
  • Morris Claybourne 
  • Deangelo Hall
  • Malcom Butler (potentially a huge piece, he feels pretty bitter most likely after that pats sat him in the SB loss)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

The whole game also showed ground and pound is as archaic as it gets in today’s NFL.

Never did the run establish play-action. Everyone literally went straight to play-action passes and it worked because that’s how football actually works.

Today’s league is a passing league. And we’re about to fall behind because Rivera wants us to be 1st in time of possession instead of 2nd.

I remember some pretty hefty runs on both sides. You can’t have one without the other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

The whole game also showed ground and pound is as archaic as it gets in today’s NFL.

Never did the run establish play-action. Everyone literally went straight to play-action passes and it worked because that’s how football actually works.

Today’s league is a passing league. And we’re about to fall behind because Rivera wants us to be 1st in time of possession instead of 2nd.

What? That could maybe work for one game at most...but no one is gonna bite on the play-action if a team notoriously doesn’t actually run the ball. That’s the kind of thing that would easily show up in the film room.

It worked cause neither team was getting any pass rush for about 90% of the game.

If Philly is supposed to epitomize why ground and pound is so archaic then why did they sign Blount and trade for Ajayi? Those two offer nothing in the passing game...they’re pure runners.

No offense should be one-dimensional...good offenses need balance. It’s no coincidence that the Saints became so dangerous this year with a much improved run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two crucial game changing plays where Philadelphia went for it on fourth down.

Just before the end of the first half:

0:38 4th and 1 at NE 1, Trey Burton pass to the right to Nick Foles for 1 yard for a TOUCHDOWN.  This was a drive that began with only two minutes remaining in the first half and allowed Philly to extend their lead to ten points going into the locker room.

And with 5:39 left in the game:

4thand 1 at Phi 45, Nick Foles pass to the left to Zach Ertz for 2 yards to the Phi 47. Tackled by Duron Harmon.  Ultimately the drive resulted in a TD that allowed Philly to take the lead for good.

I really can't see Coach Rivera going for it on 4th down during either occasion. 

Ron would have likely settled for 3 points just before the half. That's assuming Rivera made any serious effort to score at all.  Remember, when the drive started, there were only 2 minutes remaining prior to halftime.

In the fourth quarter, Ron likely would have elected to punt on fourth down, hoping for a defensive stop and one more chance to score before the game's conclusion.

Had Pederson not gone for it on either of those two occasions, chances are the Eagles would have likely lost this contest.  To his credit he kept the pedal to the metal for a full 60 minutes. 

Pedal to the metal, not something our current HC, Ron Rivera, is known for doing.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/philadelphia-eagles-at-new-england-patriots/game-center/sp-id-10401000001744983

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LordOfDaWingz said:

Lol the Eagles had 164 yards on the ground. Were you watching the bowl? they were running all over the Pats in the 1st half then New England cranked it up a notch.

 

And the Eagles revamped a lot of areas last offseason. They were never expected to be that good in the secondary.

Did you not notice they passed a whole ton before they actually started running? They went straight to play-action when the game started (and no, it’s not an RPO, as the linemen were guarding for a pass, not a run) and it worked.

They passed to set up the run game if anything. 44 passes to 27 rushes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Saca312 said:

The whole game also showed ground and pound is as archaic as it gets in today’s NFL.

Never did the run establish play-action. Everyone literally went straight to play-action passes and it worked because that’s how football actually works.

Today’s league is a passing league. And we’re about to fall behind because Rivera wants us to be 1st in time of possession instead of 2nd.

One thing about ground and pound, Brady would be on the sideline

the Eagles did a lot of surgical running,  not on first down, and it paid off.  When they abandoned that approach, NE took the lead

Ask any NFL player and they will tell you the same thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
    • I dont know. He seems like a bigger douche now than ever. I didnt hate him for being a great player.
×
×
  • Create New...