Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints Not Expected to Re-Sign Vaccaro

Soul Rebel

By Soul Rebel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/saints-reportedly-wont-re-sign-kenny-vaccaro-expect-safety-to-hit-open-market/

Just saw this pop up on CBS Sports. It's been discussed as possibly happening, but unsure if NO would stick with the two youngsters at SAF, until now. 

I wonder where Vaccaro fits financially, into the available SAF options on the FA market.  Just turned 27 years old and the kind of SS that would be in the mold of guys we prefer... Coleman/Mitchell/Harris. Not to mention having an NFCS opponent's insight to boot.

If there was a way we could land a DB combo of Fuller & Vaccaro in FA, our secondary would be insanely improved. The question is how much would that cost and is it possible. There are other options out there that could be had for cheaper. 

Thoughts on Vaccaro in Carolina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wasn't he benched a while back or was that Barron?

He was earlier this year in a move to roll Bell/Williams out there and he wasn't getting the job done. From what I read, they implemented a 3-man safety unit at times, though I'm sure our resident Saints fans could shed more light. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...