Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera acknowledges"all in" approach to this season


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Moves that sound likely so far...

- Veteran receiver (maybe Wallace)

- Veteran safety (maybe Boston)

- Derek Anderson stays as backup

- Graham Gano gets paid

- Panthers use a mid-round pick on Newton's future successor

- Norwell gone, Lotulelei probably gone unless he doesn't get a good offer elsewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

more like break open the checkbook. I'm glad that the head coach can see the window is closing, as well. We don't need more guys to develop. We still have those guys developing. We need instant starters and impact players with a veteran presence. STarting a 5th round safety is NOT A fuging OPTION

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Professor Chaos said:

It's about time. Luke, TD, Kalil, Cam, Olsen, and Peppers to get a ring. We've been "looking towards the future" for half a decade now riding the same core of players. 

Yeah I hear you and we might just be able to pull a Hoosiers type story but gotta get more speed and playmakers or its a dream.  We arent that far away IMHO.  Best move we could make is find a dance partner and move down a little from 24.  Like Jeremy mentioned we need starting level talent at multiple positions but its doable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Cary Kollins said:

These quotes are a microcosm of what makes Ron such an average head coach.

"I could be fired, so I better really make this year count."

It's the same thing that birthed "Riverboat Ron". A sense of urgency to win should be an innate characteristic in a head coach, not something that pops up every few years when your job is on the line.

exactly!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"All in" relating to what?

If you are talking about contracts and spending money I'm actually thinking the opposite.

Why would Richardson pay out a lot of signing bonuses for a team he is about to sell?  I would think it would just eat into his profits.

If we are talking about effort then we have other problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AU-panther said:

"All in" relating to what?

If you are talking about contracts and spending money I'm actually thinking the opposite.

Why would Richardson pay out a lot of signing bonuses for a team he is about to sell?  I would think it would just eat into his profits.

If we are talking about effort then we have other problems.

As in "Super Bowl or bust".

What that translates to in practical terms...well, that's the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I thought we traded Benjamin specifically to make Funchess the number one.

Now we're not sure?

Who did you hear say that we traded Benjamin to make Funchess the number one guy ?  Other than a bunch of huddle rats or talking heads in the sports world ?  As I remember it Rivera said on of the reasons they did it was to " put more speed on the field" - never once heard him mention Funchess is the no 1 receiver now.  Maybe you can post me a link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...