Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Rubin Serious Contender For Panthers Ownership


Saca312

Recommended Posts

This is interesting

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/22722780/fanatics-owner-michael-rubin-serious-bidder-carolina-panthers?sf184214817=1

Quote

Another bidder has emerged in the race to buy the Carolina Panthers: Michael Rubin, the owner of sports apparel retailer Fanatics.

Sources say Rubin, whose primary residence is in Pennsylvania and who currently owns a stake in the Philadelphia 76ers, New Jersey Devils and the Premier League team Crystal Palace, is considered a serious bidder in the race to buy the first NFL team up for sale in three and a half years.

...

Rubin has a solid reputation in the business world and is not scared to use his platform for things he believes in. He recently voiced his support for Meek Mill, the rapper whom he befriended and is now serving two to four years in prison for a controversial probation violation. Rubin has reportedly tried to use his influence to get him out of prison.

If he prevails in his bid for the Panthers, Rubin, 45, would be the second-youngest owner in the league behind the San Francisco 49ers' Jed York, who turned 37 this week.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couple of thoughts posted in the Ownership Options thread, but I like the Rubin option, and think the NFL will as well.  Tepper might be the favorite because of money, Steelers ties, and he seems more likely to be part of the old boys club.

But Rubin, kinda like the Observer article mentioned, represents more of where the NFL is going.  Online/E-commerce ties, partnerships with Amazon, and an important one that cannot be understated if Rubin needs a partner as he likely will....Alibaba.  If I'm Rubin, I make a pitch based solely on hey, y'all want to sell a TON of merchandise and licensing agreements in China?  Well I'm your guy. Now sell me this team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some owners are already familiar with him,  and the NFL already has a 3% stake in Fanatics. It would take basically all his net worth if he were to do it alone,  but he is still a serious contender for obvious reasons.  

I like him.  No baggage, already familiar with the industry,  and has a conscience. And he's a relatively young guy which probably means he's a little more in touch with today's athletes.  

Rubin is a guy I can get behind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also having a guy like Rubin would make FA interesting.  A lot of good relationships with players already, could either mean guys want to flock here to play for him...or he plays the Richardson role wanting contracts given out to his favorites and hurts us.  I think it would be the former, for the most part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couple things I notice...

The article lists "the other bidders" but doesn't mention Sabates. I think that could be telling.

The "second youngest" thing isn't necessarily a good thing to me, especially not when you look at Jed York.

Also, the news that the Fertitta brothers dropped out because they didn't want to divest their casino holdings is new. I thought things might have just gotten too rich for them.

Sounds like the price could go either way. More bidders drives it up. People holding off because other teams will be available soon could drive it down. I guess we'll see.

If the price does go up, that certainly favors the guys with the deepest pockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Couple of thoughts posted in the Ownership Options thread, but I like the Rubin option, and think the NFL will as well.  Tepper might be the favorite because of money, Steelers ties, and he seems more likely to be part of the old boys club.

But Rubin, kinda like the Observer article mentioned, represents more of where the NFL is going.  Online/E-commerce ties, partnerships with Amazon, and an important one that cannot be understated if Rubin needs a partner as he likely will....Alibaba.  If I'm Rubin, I make a pitch based solely on hey, y'all want to sell a TON of merchandise and licensing agreements in China?  Well I'm your guy. Now sell me this team. 

His business is defined as a competitor to Amazon not a partner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...