Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reading the LG tea leaves


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Based on recent acquisitions and comments, it looks as though we are going to have a competition at LG.  Here are the players:

Jeremiah Sirles: Provides depth at G and RT.  He is entering the prime of his career, and the point at which OL tend to start stepping up.  He has approximately 15 NFL starts.

Amini Silatolu:  Has experience and is in his prime, fwiw.  In fairness to RR’s favorite son-- in 2017, Silatolu is not that smart and they (for whatever reason) played him at T for a while.  He was also forced to play RG.  Silatolu is used to sucking at LG, so that may have confused him.

Taylor Moton:  In college, was reported to be a better G than T.  Moton is smart and powerful.  He has to be the front runner here.  Moton is also hungry, willing to play any position on the LOS.  Saving him to play LT post Ryan is stupid, and I think RR was told that by Norv.

Tyler Larsen:  Rivera mentioned that Larsen was in  the competition to play LG.  He has experience and should be OK there.  I have not heard the same about Van Roten.

Prediction:  Moton starts at LG, Sirles is the first reserve at both G spots.  Larsen is the third G at both spots, backup center.  Not sure where that leaves  Van Roten.  I do not see us drafting a G.  Maybe a T, maybe a C, both late.  Considering the needs we have at skill positions, I think this is smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moton will get the nod.

Hopefully we see as little of Silatolu as possible.

If Price slides far enough down the Board in the second or high third rds (meaning we trade up to grab him if he does fall to the high third) due to his pectoral year at the Combine I think we grab him as Kalil’s replacement at C, Larsen was ok in fill in duty for him but may not be the answer long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's going to be Moton. We'll look to possibly add OG depth in the later rounds unless there's an absolute steal available earlier. Center is the far more likely early pick IMO.

I think so.  I am guessing we draft a C at some point in this year's draft.  A T is possible. However, it is starting to look as if we go WR, S, CB, RB on days one and two.  Maybe TE instead of CB, depending how good they feel about Cockrell/Bradberry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, manu4t said:

Moton will get the nod.

Hopefully we see as little of Silatolu as possible.

If Price slides far enough down the Board in the second or high third rds (meaning we trade up to grab him if he does fall to the high third) due to his pectoral year at the Combine I think we grab him as Kalil’s replacement at C, Larsen was ok in fill in duty for him but may not be the answer long term.

I think we may take our next C this year, only because we do not want a rookie C in 2019--but we really should not prioritize C now. They like Arkansas C Ragnow as well.  LSU's Clapp might be in play on day 3...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’ll be Moton or a rookie. I’m pretty damn sure we’ll take a G/C in the first 3 rounds. Very likely one will be BPA at one of our 4 picks and it’s an immediate and future need. Frank Ragnow fits the bill, as does Billy Price even in the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stirs said:

Connor Williams can play T and G now and can also play Center in time if need be

I've considered him for awhile now just because I think he could fill a need and there is a good chance he could be there at 24.

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think we may take our next C this year, only because we do not want a rookie C in 2019--but we really should not prioritize C now. They like Arkansas C Ragnow as well.  LSU's Clapp might be in play on day 3...

A lot is going to depend on how they really feel about Matt Kalil.  Releasing him next year could free up considerable cap space but we don't seem to have a replacement on the roster at the moment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cyberjag said:

As far as I know, the only two linemen on the roster who have ANY experience, college or pro, at LT are Kalil and Amini.  Moton was probably never going to be held for the LT position.

About a month ago or more, they asked RR if he was going to move Moton to LG--he said, "Moton is a Tackle."

Now he is saying what we all thought when Norwell left.  Moton to G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

It’ll be Moton or a rookie. I’m pretty damn sure we’ll take a G/C in the first 3 rounds. Very likely one will be BPA at one of our 4 picks and it’s an immediate and future need. Frank Ragnow fits the bill, as does Billy Price even in the first.

Ragnow. 

I am starting to think #1 is a WR.  If we take a S and a RB on day 2, that leaves a spot.  I am guessing Ragnow might be there in the third.

A DE that falls into round 2 could throw a wrench in the spokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post @MHS831. I understand your vantage point and you very well could be right about Moton starting at LG next year.

However, I have a differing perspective and don't think we can write LG out of the question for the 1st round. 

Looking at our departed starters in F.A, we already replaced Star and likely upgraded the CB position over Worley and at minimum Corn Elder will compete for the nickel job. Our biggest holes remain replacing the Production lost at G, Safety and RB. Of course we cut both Stewart and Coleman because they were underperforming so those needs were there even last year. Historically you're better off gambling until later rounds on those 2 positions unless you have a shot at an elite player. Lastly WR and DE could definitely use some competition as well. 

Looking at this years draft class we will be lucky to have our choice of 1-3 of these scenarios coming true.

  • Picking the 1st WR
  • Picking the 2nd o-lineman
  • Picking the 3rd safety
  • Picking the 3rd Corner 
  • Picking the 3rd DE 
  • Picking the 2nd RB 

The 2nd best offensive lineman (and be expected to start at LG next year) may be the best option we have at 24 and something I think has about as equal odds as any other position at 24 at this point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...