Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mel Kipers Panthers Draft Grade (ESPN Insider)


CAPantherFan

Recommended Posts

car.png?w=110&h=110&transparent=true

Carolina Panthers: A-

Top needs: Wide receiver, cornerback, defensive end

Like their NFC South rivals in Atlanta, the Panthers went with a wide receiver in Round 1, taking Maryland's D.J. Moore at No. 24. I'm a big fan of Moore, who is more than a workout warrior, though he put up freakish numbers at the combine with a 4.42 40 time and 39.5-inch vertical. He was productive for the Terps, and he's great after the catch. He runs through arm tackles, and he's built like a tailback. The Panthers needed a guy like that for Cam Newton, and it wasn't going to be veteran Torrey Smith (another Terp), who was brought in last month. Moore could be Newton's favorite target in a hurry.

After parting ways with Daryl Worley, the Panthers needed cornerbacks to compete for the spot opposite James Bradberry. They added two on Day 2 with Donte Jackson (pick 55), one of the fastest players in this class (4.32 40), and Rashaan Gaulden (85), whom I had rated as more of a sixth-round talent. (Remember that veteran safety Kurt Colemanis no longer with the team.) Jackson is only 5-10 and 178 pounds, but he's an elite athlete. Ian Thomas could develop into the heir apparent to Greg Olsen, and to get my fourth-ranked tight end at 104 is great value. Marquis Haynes(136) is another good player on Day 3.

If there's an issue with this class, it's not getting a pass-rusher. Are they really going to rely on 38-year-old Julius Peppers to play almost 500 snaps again? Mario Addison is also going to be 31 by Week 1, and you face Matt RyanDrew Brees and Jameis Winston six times a year in that division. I liked the depth of this class, though, and won't ding it too much. There is value from top to bottom.

 

ROUND/PICK NAME POS COLLEGE
1/24 D.J. Moore WR MARYLAND
2/55 Donte Jackson CB LSU
3/85 Rashaan Gaulden CB TENNESSEE
4/101 Ian Thomas TE INDIANA
4/136 Marquis Haynes OLB OLE MISS
5/161 Jermaine Carter Jr. CB MARYLAND
7/234 Andre Smith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every site I’ve read so far has loved our draft. Maybe I’m missing something here, but I just don’t see it. I didn’t think our draft was bad, but I didn’t think it was great either. Well, the critics know more than I do, so if they like it, I’m good with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, unicar15 said:

Gaulden is going to be a safety. He moves as well as Coleman and is a good size. He’s not playing nickel...he’s going to cover TEs and play centerfield. He doesn’t need to move like a corner bc he isn’t going to play corner.

comparing players to Coleman is a compliment? The only time Coleman was any good was when he had Norman shutting down 1/2 of the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the Gettlemaniacs are freaking out. They spent the whole draft careening around in a rage bender, livid and incredulous about how obviously horrible all of Hurney's picks were.

"I'VE NEVER EVEN HEARD OF THIS GUY!!! HE'S TERRIBLE!!!" 

"DAVE WOULD HAVE GOT MINKAH FITZPATRICK IN THE FOURTH, WHAT THE HELL IS THIS IDIOT HURNEY DOING?!?"

Now they're seeing that more clear-eyed and objective people around the league unanimously feel that this was a brilliant draft. And it hurts them. It really hurts them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't understand why we don't just draft all-pros with our picks. It's not that difficult, you have a bunch of professional scouts on the Huddle that know way more than NFL scouts and GM's. All you have to do is only draft players you know the name of, go down a big board and pick the top player and only analyze highlight tapes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Hurney got a pretty good draft without having to jump up like I thought he would, got a great wide receiver that had 37% of Maryland’s offense by himself with 4 quarterbacks and tons of contested catches, a super fast corner with an attitude like Josh Norman that we needed yesterday, and the tightend. The rest I’m in a reserved status only because I don’t know that much about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

comparing players to Coleman is a compliment? The only time Coleman was any good was when he had Norman shutting down 1/2 of the field. 

Coleman was decent in 2016 also but you are right that he only looked like a Pro Bowler when he had an All-Pro beside him.

Coleman certainly wasn't the only problem in the secondary last year, but he was a major liability. 

I like Coleman as a person, but he got beat over the top more often that not last year.

The Julio drop play epitomized his play last year even though he got lucky on that one particular play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...