Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney confirms were not done in free agency on WFNZ


Recommended Posts

Heres a recap of what stood out to me when listening to the full interview:

  • They were ready for every scenario possible to play out
  • Really thinks Ian Thomas can be a complete tight end and was a great value at top of 4th,made sure to mention him 1st when asked about Skill position players added.
  • Sure sounds like our first pick was locked in on being a WR because we knew 1 of Ridley or Moore would be there. I think he assumed another team would make the decision for us on which one (Moore or Ridley) and if they had already gone would have pushed Ragnow down and he would have been the guy
  • "Honestly it was tough decision" Tiebreaker went to Moore because of run after catch ability and the fact that he still produced while teams knew he was essentially the whole offense at Maryland and locked in on stopping him. 
  • Donte Jackson gives us a skill set we didn't have on the roster. 
  • Washington want's to play more man to man, having players like Donte who can follow a speedy guy inside or out will help with that
  • Gaulden, has all the traits of a safety and think he will turn into a guy who will play back there for a long time
  • Lot's of guards we liked but they flew off the board, considered trading up to grab one, but teams were asking too much so that thought didn't last long
  • Really would have liked to add interior o-line, RB, and backup QB in the draft but board did not fall that way, so we took what the board gave us at other positions of need
  • Kept saying you've got to decide where to put your resources you have left and what position's. Got to prioritize what areas your going to spend he resources you have left and what positions they will go to. 
  • Safety absolutely could be added "if the right one comes up and we can afford to do that then we will"
  • Was then asked about Eric Reid and said "we definitely looked at him and now you have to decide do you feel good at saftey, backup RB, backup QB and where you're going to use your resources" 
  • Tre Boston has alluded to it before but I think the "if we can afford it" statement from Hurney kind of confirms safeties haven't signed yet because theres too much of a gap in what the players at the safety position feel they are worth and what the teams value them at. This is specific to the safety position. 
  • He kept using the word resources instead of cap space, so maybe i'm reading too much into it but a trade may be possible as well. 
  • I feel like we are almost guaranteed to bring in a vet RB AND QB after it won't affect our comp picks (may 11th).

About 14 minutes,feel free to listen for yourself here: http://www.wfnz.com/articles/news/marty-hurney-we-looked-eric-reid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mentioned it in another thread, but Walt Bell has been shouting from the rooftop for over a year about how special of a player Gold Jacket is. It's pretty clear - I think to anyone - when a coach genuinely feels a player has The Right Stuff versus when he just feels obligated to speak up for one of his charges. In this case, it's certainly the former. The way Marty phrased it, re: production against the odds, is telling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RetiredCollegeCoach said:

...and this is why he's great, folks.

No too-clever-by-half bullsh*t or deranged arrogance - just reading the field and playing the game. An absolute master aging like a fine wine.

Ok Marty....you're not even trying to hide yourself anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice summary. Well done. Hurney's interviews are usually insightful and forthcoming. 

A couple of thoughts:

I know Steve Smith was saying yesterday that he got texts from 3 teams that were pissed off on draft night that the Panthers took Moore when they did. 

As you eluded to, Tre Boston has said that the available safeties are being offered WR 4 type money at the moment. As mentioned in another thread, the safety position is really devalued right now across the league.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, RetiredCollegeCoach said:

Mentioned it in another thread, but Walt Bell has been shouting from the rooftop for over a year about how special of a player Gold Jacket is. It's pretty clear - I think to anyone - when a coach genuinely feels a player has The Right Stuff versus when he just feels obligated to speak up for one of his charges. In this case, it's certainly the former. The way Marty phrased it, re: production against the odds, is telling.

who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panther4life said:

Heres a recap of what stood out to me when listening to the full interview:

  • They were ready for every scenario possible to play out
  • Really thinks Ian Thomas can be a complete tight end and was a great value at top of 4th,made sure to mention him 1st when asked about Skill position players added.
  • Sure sounds like our first pick was locked in on being a WR because we knew 1 of Ridley or Moore would be there. I think he assumed another team would make the decision for us on which one (Moore or Ridley) and if they had already gone would have pushed Ragnow down and he would have been the guy
  • "Honestly it was tough decision" Tiebreaker went to Moore because of run after catch ability and the fact that he still produced while teams knew he was essentially the whole offense at Maryland and locked in on stopping him. 
  • Donte Jackson gives us a skill set we didn't have on the roster. 
  • Washington want's to play more man to man, having players like Donte who can follow a speedy guy inside or out will help with that
  • Gaulden, has all the traits of a safety and think he will turn into a guy who will play back there for a long time
  • Lot's of guards we liked but they flew off the board, considered trading up to grab one, but teams were asking too much so that thought didn't last long
  • Really would have liked to add interior o-line, RB, and backup QB in the draft but board did not fall that way, so we took what the board gave us at other positions of need
  • Kept saying you've got to decide where to put your resources you have left and what position's. Got to prioritize what areas your going to spend he resources you have left and what positions they will go to. 
  • Safety absolutely could be added "if the right one comes up and we can afford to do that then we will"
  • Was then asked about Eric Reid and said "we definitely looked at him and now you have to decide do you feel good at saftey, backup RB, backup QB and where you're going to use your resources" 
  • Tre Boston has alluded to it before but I think the "if we can afford it" statement from Hurney kind of confirms safeties haven't signed yet because theres too much of a gap in what the players at the safety position feel they are worth and what the teams value them at. This is specific to the safety position. 
  • He kept using the word resources instead of cap space, so maybe i'm reading too much into it but a trade may be possible as well. 
  • I feel like we are almost guaranteed to bring in a vet RB AND QB after it won't affect our comp picks (may 11th).

About 14 minutes,feel free to listen for yourself here: http://www.wfnz.com/articles/news/marty-hurney-we-looked-eric-reid

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, countryboi said:

Come on Hurney go ahead and Boston a call, he is hanging around Charlotte I saw him at he Harris Y just last week. 

Tre has stated that he spoke with the Panthers and they pretty much made it clear they weren't interested (or not interested enough). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me it sounds like Hurney learned a lot and is thinking now without sacrificing tomorrow.

This is new direction with a familiar face that took lessons of yesterday to heart.

He still loves speed in skilled positions, he still loves attitude and still takes risks but this time without mortgaging future resources.

Thanks for the review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...