Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jarius Wright, for all intents and purposes, a coach


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I've often thought that some Huddlers are fluffing up Jarius Wright's future role on the field as our primary slot receiver this season. Not saying that I don't think that he's good depth, but I don't believe that he's destined to become our version of the Pats' Wes Welker. In my opinion, there's just better talent that would have to be on the bench, or on ice, for Wright to see appreciable playing time come October. That being said, in addition to---perhaps---some clutch plays, he offers knowledge. And as I read between the lines, helping to teach Norv's system to the younger, more talented guys could very we'll be the primary reason Wright was acquired and paid such a WTF---err, surprising---signing bonus. The good thing is that he appears ready to embrace the role.

“I feel I could teach Norv Turner’s offense to a baby,” Wright says."

 

That "nugget" came up in Wright's discussion with Scott Fowler.

So, yeah, I could be totally off base, and simply being a little cynical about the Huddle's next big thing that never seems to reach expectations, but I think I may have figured the whole Wright situation out. Sure, he'll compete for the primary slot gig FWIW, but he'll also "coach," because he knows Norv's system like the back of his hand.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe a player has to have impressive stats to serve a purpose on a roster. If all he does is provide leadership and a veteran backup then he has been a successful addition.

If it's December and he has to fill in a few games would anybody be upset?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RumHam said:

Yeah but why is Russell Shepherd still on the roster? Hurneymagic?

Because you need the bodies for camp, I don't see him on the 53, he doesn't add anything other than ST's ability, and IMO that ''ST Ace'' talk is just that, talk, run down the field, stay in your lane, and hit the guy with the ball. 

Lane discipline, and not out kicking the coverage on punts is the biggest thing. You can't tell me Teddy Williams, or Russell Shepard are so good that you literally waste roster positions just for that, and to be the 5th or 6th at their respective positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Yeah but why is Russell Shepherd still on the roster? Hurneymagic?

Because for cap purposes, it makes more sense to cut him post June 1st, unless something has changed that I haven't kept up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I don't believe a player has to have impressive stats to serve a purpose on a roster. If all he does is provide leadership and a veteran backup then he has been a successful addition.

If it's December and he has to fill in a few games would anybody be upset?

I agree when your late night studying I'm pretty sure I'm a call my boy Jarius over Norv or someone on the staff for some late night clarity. And it seems like he's willing to teach this is going to be good, with his speed in the slot might get great production on and off the field.

19 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Before asking that question, you would be better served to ask why Gettleman elected to sign Shepard over Ginn when the two have nearly identical contracts.

I think we were TRULY sick of those damn drops he played decent spaced the field out for us to be successful offensively. But those drops were costly and Dave always out smarted himself thinking anybody can produce given the chance. They use to joke ohhhh he caught the ball TD Ginn  lol I remember someone saying if he caught the ball some Cam would have had 40 pass TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly.  You let him play out next season and continue to develop Thorton.  Jackson’s earned his next contract, but his age and the risk of tying up such a large portion of the payroll at one position leads me to believe that we’ll let him walk. In all likelihood, we’ll draft another CB, or two, and bring in some journeymen to fill the roster void, between now and the start of the 2027 season.  That’ll create more balance financially across the roster enabling us to invest in other areas.  
    • As far as the NFCS … I think this division will be hotly contested the next couple of years.   I am tending to pay more respect to both Atlanta and the Saints n terms of how strong they will be moving forward, than not.    I am mixed on Ryan but think they have a decent roster to start with. I don’t think he blundered hiring Stefanski. And that offense can be dangerous with a QB. Plus, defense is arrow up. No 1st round pick, WB issues will dull their effectiveness. Question is, to what degree?   I think Moore is going to be a good HC and can overcome tape that people have on Shough. They need a lot but they were playing with people. Just the way you want to see all the way to the end.    Not sure about Tampa they have Mayfield but I don’t think they can maintain their success and Bowles is not going to last much longer. They have to go through all that. Gonna be tough once it starts. Might already have started.    For us I feel pretty good about Morgan. But less so about our offense, we have some short term RB and OL issues and those things are critical given what we are working with at QB.  Overall, mixed. Like a lot of what I see but some major question marks remain.     
    • Absolutely. If we are talking about a 20 year old youngster. He's a grown-ass man, and he doesn't know what his job entails or how to do it? Maybe he will be better next year! It's the Panther way.
×
×
  • Create New...