Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Logos Ranked

CarolinaSamurai

By CarolinaSamurai,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CarolinaSamurai Newbie

CarolinaSamurai

Posted
Posted

#11 Carolina Panters

carolina-panthers.png?zoom=4&w=900

FanJuicer: You’ve alluded to this one quite a bit when we’ve talked about some of the other logos.

 

The Graphic Designer: It is definitely one of my favorites. I don’t think I realized that until I started comparing all the logos to one another.

FanJuicer: So from a graphic design standpoint, what works about it?

The Graphic Designer: The colors are the first thing that sticks out. The black and the blue look great. You have this excellent bright blue to contrast this deep dark black that gives the shadowy effect of the panther. The white teeth and the eyes contrast very well with the darkness of the figure. They stand out well against the dark shadowy figure. It communicates toughness and aggression in a visually pleasing way. It’s an ominous effect that the designers achieved without looking like they were trying too hard. That’s tough to pull off. I love how this looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Borat Collaborator

Borat

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, theDIRTYcode2 said:

Dude is a fugging Saints fan. They can't wipe their own ass, much less give a qualified opinion about logo design. 

The graphic designer saints fan gave her opinion on the logos themselves, but didn’t  contribute to the rankings. She actually said the Panthers’ is her favorite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted

"This week on fanjuicer.com....'Nachos- Pointy or Round?' "

"Well, Jimmy, the round ones are good for scooping cheese. And them points are sharp!!"

"You effing tard pattie!! You can't get all the cheese with a round chip!! It's science, you ignorant bastard !!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fryfan Grand Master

Fryfan

Posted
Posted

Obvious team/location bias in major effect   A blue star #14?  come on.

 

 

--

#26 Baltimore Ravens

Ravens.png?w=900

The Graphic Designer: I really love the colors. The dark navies, purples, and gold create an intense effect. Mixing it with the red eye is a really great effect. I think that makes a lot of sense and adds a lot. While I love the use of colors, I don’t really like the full shape of the logo. There’s almost too many curves and hooks. It is a little too narrow to the point to where it is almost rectangular. That could make this logo difficult to work with. From a design standpoint, I think you usually want a shape that is conducive to a lot of different formats and situations. You want something that is going to go well on a hat, a shirt, but also look nice in print or on TV. I could see them having trouble with this one because of how long and narrow it is. I think you could make this one a little more round and it would still work. I still think this is a good one.

#14 Dallas Cowboys

cowboys-1.png?w=900

The Graphic Designer: It’s maybe a touch more dull than say, the Panthers logo, but overall I like this logo. It feels classic. It has a classic shape, easily recognizable symbolism with Texas, and I don’t think there is a situation where this wouldn’t work. I might could see how some could say this is boring, but I personally don’t think so. I really like the white outline followed by another navy outline. I could see how this logo would stand the test of time.
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      shough vs tmac off rookie of the year

      By cranky · Posted

      First, am I wrong? I looked back over all his posts here and I didn't see anything positive other than Shough. Second, pretty sure if you had read the post I was responding to, you would have seen CRA made poo personal as well . You just choose to address me instead of him. Not sure why?????
    • SCMunnerlyn1
      Give Legette another season?

      By SCMunnerlyn1 · Posted

      I wanted XL but I felt he should have been a 2nd rounder but I understand the logic trading up just to get the option. A safety net for your gamble.    Certainly disappointed with his receivers development but i like his down field blocking and I imagine that's what's keeping him on the field. 
    • cranky
      Greg Cosell on Bryce Young

      By cranky · Posted

      Pretty sure it is a given Young lacks typical QB size and strength and he is here simply because his other attributes more than make up for it. My point is not to indicate anyone "settled" for him but rather to remind people that there have been plenty of big, strong QB's that have not lived up to expectations. Jamis Winston, Anthony Richardson, Trey Lance, JaMarcus Russel are a few examples. They all have the physical attributes coveted by teams and yet none have had sustained success in the NFL. And yes, there are QBs that do have both but there aren't many and some of the ones still playing were failures with their early teams. Saying Young is a bust simply based upon his size (and I do think it is as simple as that for a few guys around here) is unfair to both him and the team.
×
×
  • Create New...