Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is Vermillion still employed?


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Aging teams have more injuries. Vermillion has done an incredible job over the years of getting players back on the field and ready to play again. The next time you see Thomas Davis just knock the living crap out of a running back, thank Vermillion.

 

also PEDs, but that's none of my bidness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Serious question. He's been with the team for so long and every year there's an injury or recurring one. Greg's foot.. Willaims being rushed back, Kalil brithers, Byrd, etc. 

 

I don't get it. Some injuries could have been prevented. 

Yes damn him for making Greg step on that guys foot and allowing Williams' knee to get hit. I hurt my back the other day working, I'm going to fire my doctor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only team who needs to fire their training staff on a regular basis is the Chargers because year in and year out they have devastating injuries across the board. 

Contrary to what many on here believe; we as a franchise are not special. We don't have more injuries per year than anyone else. Every team deals with injuries to starters every year. It's all a crapshoot every year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am not worried about the contracts because any/all can be jettisoned in 2027 with minimal ramifications. I would like to land him because you rarely ever see an elite, 25 year old center hit free agency, this is a very weak center class and Mays is a bottom quarter starting center(love him as a utility IOL).  Ideally this offseason we solve center and draft a high caliber RT/LT to fill the gap for Ikey. Then next offseason, pending outcome of the rookie and Ikey's recovery you can jettison Hunt(VASTLY overpaid), make a determination on Ikey's ability to play(perhaps extend him on the franchise tag as a "prove it"), and let the Ikey/rookien situation dictate Moton. He can be extended on a LOWER cost deal or jettisoned if Ikey and the rookie can take the reigns. Either way, both OT's will need to be resolved, we need an actually starting caliber NFL center again and we need to get rid of one of these OG's. Hunt is the obvious choice as Lewis is substantially better across the board and cheaper.
    • That's not a thing. If they can't find someone, they either aren't actually trying or it's a poisonous job and no one will.  Yes, plenty of them have gone with whom they wanted already. That's not really the point of the rule. It's to force teams to provide opportunities. It has worked well because coaches that wouldn't normally be given interviews are given that experience and teams have also been impressed enough to either offer them in the future or pass positive comments along to other NFL owners/front office personnel.  Also, we are over 20 years into the Rooney Rule. This isn't some new thing teams have to navigate. 
    • I mean, as soon as Svech scores on the guy, trot out your best shooters while the goalie is still in his head and go for the kill.  Last night made absolute zero sense. 
×
×
  • Create New...