Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Moton a legitimate left tackle in the NFL?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

So much talk about how horrible Amini was at RT, did you notice not much talk about Moton? I feel like his performance was better than Kalil's would have been. Agree?

 

Is Moton the future at LT?

Not mentioning an LT during the game is a big, big upgrade. That was his first start in the NFL, against a strong Cowboys front 7 -- he did really well. And he is still learning the position. 

I think he's going to be excellent eventually, but we may have a rough game or two and some folks will throw him under the bus and call him bad things, at least here.

He's going to be excellent, though, in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He played better than I’ve ever seen Matt Kalil play for us and we payed Kalil 55 fuging million dollars.

Also it really says something since Kalil had a 60 million dollar All pro guard next to him. Just imagine Moton and Norwell...... Oh what could have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He is "Keep Pounding." https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45498715/nfl-carolina-panthers-chuba-hubbard-olympics-flag-football-track
    • This.  He knows where the seam is about to open, cuts, and accelerates hard. He’s slippery and tacklers always seem to be taking awkward angles to get to him. No dancing. Runs low and powerful. Almost never goes backwards for a loss. We’ve rarely had the guy who bounces off of tacklers. It’s nice seeing another one. 
    • I can't speak for others but yes I read it. The conclusions are based heavily around the use of the statistical metric DYAR created by football outsiders and used by ESPN for this article. It only includes players whose production began in 2000. But excluding HOF running backs who produced BIG in an iteration of the NFL that was not yet catered to making things much easier for offenses in order for them to prop up more recent candidates is rather absurd and seems like just playing favorites regardless of where one might fall on their opinion of the use of the metric in question. 
×
×
  • Create New...