Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kudos to O-Line


App Panther

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Yeah they did a better then expected job yesterday, sidenote has it been released on whether Darryl is done for the year or not ?

Nothing official that I've heard, but footballguys.com has a doctor on staff who is saying it's "doubtful" that he returns after the IR stint.  

Ref:  Clark, it looked like they were giving him help on some plays, which is good.  He seemed to be able to force the outside speed rush just far enough behind Cam to give that extra second that a QB needs to finish his progressions and/or step up where the pocket is cleaner.  Tak McKinley got home a few times though, and the Falcons seemed to be able to confuse the left side with stunts.  I'm curious to see how they grade out on PFF this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I expected a dumpster fire, but only saw a small trash can aflame. 

Honestly not as bad as I anticipated and could actually improve if given time to gel with one another... hopefully... maybe.

No time for that.

We have Matt and Amini coming back. Honest question...when they do...you think Ron will bench them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cracka McNasty said:

I expected a dumpster fire, but only saw a small trash can aflame. 

Honestly not as bad as I anticipated and could actually improve if given time to gel with one another... hopefully... maybe.

I posted elsewhere (probably unread):

 

"And about the OL, I might add that all the fears about Amini getting the nod from RR were unfounded.  He only saw the field for 4 snaps on ST.  The 5 guys that started on the OL (Clark, Van Roten, Kalil, Larsen, and Moton) played EVERY snap -- haven't seen that in ages.  With the success they exhibited (2 sacks allowed, on a heavy passing day for Cam), and a 6.7 rushing average on 18 runs, we should see no changes there."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2018 at 10:53 AM, Cracka McNasty said:

I expected a dumpster fire, but only saw a small trash can aflame. 

Honestly not as bad as I anticipated and could actually improve if given time to gel with one another... hopefully... maybe.

Van Rotten is the MVP of this game, with Turner coming back this OL is going to be top 10!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...