Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Wilson is no Cam Newton


Nate Dogg

Recommended Posts

Tonight, Russell Wilson is getting a taste of the medicine that Cam has had to swallow for years. No pocket, no time, no legitimate weapons on the outside. No help. Only thing is, Cam still looks like a mother fuging beast under the same circumstances. I wish this entire fan base understood how fortunate we are to watch Cam Newton play football. With Cam under center, you know we have a fighting chance any given Sunday. Can you imagine if Cam had a game like this? The media would be lining up for miles to pile on the he’s no good narrative. So glad Cam Newton is my quarterback. Keep Pounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that the raiders got a couple first round picks for Mack but holy crap that trade is going to go down as one of the worst trades in NFL history especially if the Raiders don’t hit home runs with their acquired picks. Mack basically has defensive player of the year locked up the second week of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Nate Dogg said:

Tonight, Russell Wilson is getting a taste of the medicine that Cam has had to swallow for years. No pocket, no time, no legitimate weapons on the outside. No help. Only thing is, Cam still looks like a mother fuging beast under the same circumstances. I wish this entire fan base understood how fortunate we are to watch Cam Newton play football. With Cam under center, you know we have a fighting chance any given Sunday. Can you imagine if Cam had a game like this? The media would be lining up for miles to pile on the he’s no good narrative. So glad Cam Newton is my quarterback. Keep Pounding.

LOUDER FOR THE HATERS IN THE BACK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russel Wilson has been one of the luckiest players I have ever seen play the game of football. For some reason analysts just chalk it up to him being a "gamer". No there is nothing inherently good about narrowly avoiding sacks because you held onto the ball too long, running 20 yards backfield, miraculously avoiding getting sacked then just chucking the ball up and praying for a miracle catch which happens more often than not. 

Sorry I know there is a lot of pack fans on here who love him, but god damn he is so overrated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...