Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Think We Will See More of DJ Moore


Butterflyj30

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Fright said:

Of course.. Ron felt a little heat so we’re going to see Moore get 10 targets and 30 touches between CJ and CMC and dominate the game.

 

Then it’ll be back to same ol same ol bullshit game plans once Ron feels nice and comfy after the win.

Hopefully with Tepper at the helm, Ron doesn't get a chance to be comfy again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasnt it reported they wanted moore to learn every receiver position in the playbook? I mean jesus what the hell for? Why place such a burden on the guy just coming in to the league instead one of the veterans guys who been here? It makes no sense, just give him a position and a couple routes and get him the ball. The guys playmaking ability is to valuable to only give him minimal reps a game alone. Leave the exotic stuff for the vets. The guy is 21 years old with fresh legs, he has plenty of time to learn other positions while getting experience ON the field. Ron and co. Really make my head hurt sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I recall them getting Curtis Samuel more involved last season only to say afterwards that they threw too much at him.

Woah could it be that each rookie is an individual person and grows differently and the coaches have a better understanding than we do???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see all WR involve every week. I'm just so tired of seeing Funchess, Smith, and Wright on every down when we could throw the others in the mix. I know it ain't hard for Norv and the coaching staff to do that. Open up that playbook! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...