Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Three.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Three.

# of Turnovers

# of Curtis Samuel snaps

 

Neither are acceptable.

considering how little we ran the ball....the fact Samuel got 3 snaps is mind boggling. 

But not surprising in the Rivera era.  Mind boggling stuff like that happens all the time. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

I still haven't heard why Moore was returning punts over him. Isn't Samuel behind Byrd on the returner depth chart?

Don't let the fumbles fool you.  We don't need to be complaining about Moore doing punts or playing.   Dude needs to be on the field as much as possible.   He is a true game changer. 

But yeah, Samuel needs way more snaps and opportunities.  They don't need to come out of Moore's snaps.  They need to come out of all the other guys' snaps. 

Easy prediction.  Smith will get WAY too many snaps vs the Eagles.   His 2 plays this week were 100% playcall.  100%.  Any WR on the field for us would have been open for those plays.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

And teams don't win after three bad turnovers.

I got curious and looked it up on PFR this am.  Since 2011 there have been 340 games where a team had a -3 turnover differential or worse. 16 wins. 

So 95%+ of the time a team in our situation has lost since 2011.  It happens. It would have been awesome to pull out the best Panthers 4th qtr comeback ever. Thought we were going to do it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...