Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe it's just me, but Bradberry still appears sketchy as hell


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I remember when we thought that Bradberry was going to be a better version of J-No at his best. He seemed like a cerebral player that would be well above average once his physical skills, experience and instincts synced up with his mentality. If someone still thinks that, why?

Honestly, when I see the ball going Bradberry's way, I hold my breath a little bit like I do with every kicker who has attempted a field goal since Kasay left. I mean, I see Bradberry getting burned burned, and then I see him getting burned and flat out getting lucky as the ball bounces off his back, head or some other body part while the ball arrives with Bradberry's back to the ball. I mean, he must be a helluva eye reader. He hardly ever makes a play on the ball. He just doesn't seem to have the instincts, speed or quickness to deny most receivers the ball, much less make a play on a contested catch. He usually makes the tackle though...after watching his assignment make the catch. I am just beginning to think that his ceiling is limited. 

Perhaps his second half of the season will be better than his first and he'll turn a corner, but I'm not really impressed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's definitely hot and cold. He looked great against Julio an AJ Green earlier this year, but yeah, he's prone to getting beat deep and he never has a single clue where the ball is once it's in the air. He may have the worst ball skills I've ever seen at the NFL level and they seem to be getting progressively worse. But, at his best he's a very solid cover guy. Jackson may pass him in career INTs by the end of his rookie season. Bradberry may never hit double digits for his entire career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A corner is gonna give up plays.  He’s not perfect but he’s good enough. 

I’d be more concerned if Jackson wasn’t playing as well as he has but since he is, it’s fine.  Corners gonna give up plays in 2018.  Bradberry does a good enough job minimizing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My issue with James is he has arguably the worst ball skills of any db in the league. He is a fine cover corner but as we know turnovers can be the difference between a win and a loss. He doesn't have fifth year option and I really hope we don't break the bank to sign a guy who can't catch a cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

My issue with James is he has arguably the worst ball skills of any db in the league. He is a fine cover corner but as we know turnovers can be the difference between a win and a loss. He doesn't have fifth year option and I really hope we don't break the bank to sign a guy who can't catch a cold.

That's the nice thing. I think without blazing speed and without game breaking turnover ability he should be relatively affordable for a starting CB. I don't think he's the type of player the rest if the league is going to be begging to back up there Brinks truck to steal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Car123 said:

He's average.

All things considered, I'd agree. He's a solid coverage guy but he doesn't have great deep speed and his ball skills are honestly terrible. The thing is though that "average" isn't necessary a bad thing. If you can lock him up long-term at average starting CB money I think you do it. I think we can. I just don't think he has the splash factor that makes teams overpay. He's really solid while almost entirely lacking in splash factor. In terms of bang for the buck that should work in our favor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Professor Chaos said:

This place has always been too high on him and the Josh Norman comparisons were never accurate. His play is not starting CB caliber.

Yeah....except for the fact that he's been a decent starting CB. (I'm going to assume that you missed Josh Norman's first 2 years.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I’m a opposing NFL QB and I need  7-8 yards for a first down   I’m throwing it to whomever is being covered by #24.

  He does a great job tackling after giving up the catch & he limits the yac, but gives up way too many keep the drive alive plays   

For an example Look at the last 2 games it seems other teams aren’t throwing at Jackson.  It looks like they picking on #24 regularly. Hes average which isn’t a bad thing. But he’s not a #1 corner 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope we're not going all in this year. We couldn't outright win our own division with a losing record. We had 2 anomalous wins. Typically you aren't going to win scoring 13 and have your opponent have an absolute train wreck offense.  Also, a team scoring 16 on 6 trips to the red zone is not normal either. I'm not trying to be a pessimist. We're not there. Bryce isn't there. Most of the year our offense legitimately struggled and the missing piece wasn't a TE. Keep building through the draft and reasonable FA. When we have a team that's on the edge of being able to make a legitimate SB run, then go all in. Otherwise, going all in right now feels like another Bryce situation. Sell out and pray. That's not how consistent winners are built. 
    • XL might never reach his full potential here but I think he does have a legitimate shot at becoming a pretty good #2-3. We knew when we picked him that he was raw but his athletic traits were hard to pass on.  I still remember coming here and telling 85% of huddlers to not give up on DB yet after his first couple of years here.  I just knew DB was going to special. I wouldn't put XL in that exact same category but I wouldn't write him off yet. I think our playcalling is also working against his strengths.  At the very least, we should have a servicable #3 receiver w/ speed between XL, Horn Jr, and Meetchie. 
    • I think we haven't praised Morgan/tilis enough. In this thread we have some huddles best and its hard to figure out what to do with the 19th pick, if you understand that. Im also posting what "I" believe they are doing and what I feel is best. Those FA signess send a clear signal- They are going all-in to win this coming season. If you factor that in, just believe it first, it 100% changes what going on with pick 19, cause 51st pick doesn't matter as the talent level drop is petty big between the two. So 19 is the biggest difference maker on the current plan of all-in for the 2026.  Then you factor in who will be there at, (I better hold off on my other strong thought here- I think trade up is the best help too, yes using that 3rd to do so too...) DT, ILB(Allen? he didn't run), OC, QB(ooo my I don't want to rage drool my hate again about how I feel here, plus F it draft TY simp not joking)....... those 4 groups don't have the "BPA" at 19. You can add ILB Hill in there, but I feel 19 just is too high, other disagree.  Slot or TE it is......Kenyon is the only TE worth a 1st and he's the classic draft dilemma- All sort of he's a top ten lock to he's a non-blocking one trick WR that's not even worth 2nd currency. Then there's he's the clear winner from the TE group, thus increases his value more no matter the opinion.  Honestly I see the Matt Millen outcome as the current odds favorite, I think the huddle would go bonkers for weeks as result......just the truth tho, WR had the highest odds to be the clear BPA and slot is a need...plus if we are talking about Walker being a one year deal, Coker is a one year too(he may have another controll yr, I got to confirm it tho). Plus God forbid Tmac gets hurt, the drop in talent from him or Coker to Moore is fuging scary, I'd say more than the recent OT stone fellow. It goes back back to adding talent no matter what, draft now help, and where are  the weak points are in the system you want to run....  
×
×
  • Create New...