Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Have we done enough to beat the Saints?


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Looking at this team, it all doesn't matter until the last 3 weeks of the season and how do we beat the Saints (who we lost to 3x last year)...
the only major differences between us Then and us Now are...
1 WR corps: DJ & Samuel > Shepard & Bersin
2 Secondary: Reid & Jackson Coleman & Worley

Plain and simple - Are those 2 factors enough for us to beat the Saints?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to say yes.

I think our secondary can now hang with their WRs, especially with Ginn out. I suspect both Bradberry and Jackson will see some time on Thomas. Reid and Adams are going to have to play up a bit when we play them to keep Brees honest over the middle of the field, but I think we're okay on the outside and down the field.

Where we'll need to improve before we get to them, as has been said, is pass rush. I think we'll have to compensate with some nickel and LB blitzes, but we can get pressure. Because of our safeties playing up, we'll also have run support.

One thing I've noticed with the Saints is that they are trying to get a little cutesy with incorporating Taysom Hill. I get that he's a great athlete and all that and that he adds versatility and misdirection to their offense, but I don't think he'll be that difficult to gameplan when the time comes. I'd rather him be taking up a spot on the field than either Ingram, Kamara, or a WR tbqh, so bring it on.

I'm not sold on their defense being even decent. I think we should be able to move the ball on them.

They should be high scoring games, but I expect we'll be good enough to beat them at least once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When looking at remaining schedules, I'm confident (ok, maybe semi-confident) that if we split the season series with them we win the division. They have a rough schedule and I do think the holes they have shown before are still there. 

If we beat them at home, we'll be in a good spot. That is also assuming that we can get our revenge game against the Falcons at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

Looking at this team, it all doesn't matter until the last 3 weeks of the season and how do we beat the Saints (who we lost to 3x last year)...
the only major differences between us Then and us Now are...
1 WR corps: DJ & Samuel > Shepard & Bersin
2 Secondary: Reid & Jackson Coleman & Worley

Plain and simple - Are those 2 factors enough for us to beat the Saints?

You forgot Norv.  The Panthers would have beaten the Saints in the playoffs last year if they could have gotten in ball in the endzone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

NO... we don't have enough to put pressure on Brees and get him off the spot. If this team is going to contend, we need a pass rusher or Brees/Goff are going to carve us up

have always said with Norv, the O would get better as the season gets on.  Wouldn't take shape until midseason.

Same can be said for a first time playcaller in Washington.  There is a learning curve.  We talent to get to the QB....we have time to get better.  We have time for him to learn how to get to the QB.  Past few years was largely scheme and well timed blitzing being part of that.  We can get there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...