Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is a 12-4 team if we just get rid of Gano, Funchess and Washington


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

I get what you are saying, Gano was bad, but without him, we’d be 5-5. 

I give Gano credit for making that kick against the Giants, but you could make an argument that it's his fault we aren't chasing a fourth straight winning season. In 2016, he cost us at least three games...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As bad as Gano was, you can still overcome an inconsistent kicker.

If we hire a new staff then the head coach has to be offensive minded.

I despise the Saints and Sean Payton, but they absolutely waxed this team the last 3 times we met, and Payton already brought that team one Super Bowl while they look primed to make a strong run for another.

Meanwhile we're stuck with Ron Rivera who still fails at basic situational coaching 8 years into his head coaching gig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gano is here because Ron and Marty decided to cut Butker and give the vet a big extension.  Funchess plays because Ron prefers experience over talent and production.  Washington is DC because Ron thinks he's a nice guy and didn't want to search for someone qualified.  Common theme here, guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to add that I think highly of Ron as a person and respect his loyalty to players (the ones who deserve it at least). That said, as is often the case once a coach is in his sixth, seventh or eighth year with the same team, the rah-rah isn't outweighing the same miserable failures over and over. It's time for a change. 

Additionally, Marty needs to go. I think he's done an admirable job in his second term here -- far better than his first term, to be honest -- but if he's making the hiring decisions, we're fuged because it'll be another retread defensive coordinator. Don't be shocked if it's Ron Meeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gano has won far, FAR more games for us than he's lost.  It's not even close.  If we cut Gano, he'd be unemployed less than 24 hours.  He's one of the best kickers in the game today.

I know it sucks to hear that after we lost a game partly on his misses.  That doesn't make it any less true.  The real solution is to stop letting it come down to a kick or two.  Our offense was wildly inconsistent out there in Detroit.  We had a handful of drives where it looked like the second coming of "The Greatest Show on Turf".  I mean, look!

image.png.14ec1abbd8704accc6cb00442741c5bd.png

90, 92 and 75 yard TD drives.  That's amazing.

Then we had drives where we looked like, well, the Panthers.

image.png.6f36695f64cd4517be718c8f3b201357.png

Kicking wasn't the issue.  Offensive consistency was.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funchess plays because it’s his last year and he’s on a prove it deal basically. 

I personally have seen enough, and I hate very much he’s confirmed everything I have disliked about him. He’s a Lafell,.. makes some good catches, then drops them when games and drives are on the line. Only his attitude makes him better than Benji.

Gano,... besides making the kick of his life,.. sucks. That big kick is the only reason he gets the pass that he does.

this team is not a 12-4 team without them though,.. 

We would be a 10-6 or 11-5 team with Wilkes and an NFC championship team if we had McDermott back.

Also, Ron having Norv play the first half like we have a lights our defense is putting us in serious holes every game.

if we would play aggressive past the first drive expecting our defense to fail instead of leaning on them we would do much better

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Gano has won far, FAR more games for us than he's lost.  It's not even close.  If we cut Gano, he'd be unemployed less than 24 hours.  He's one of the best kickers in the game today.

I know it sucks to hear that after we lost a game partly on his misses.  That doesn't make it any less true.  The real solution is to stop letting it come down to a kick or two.  Our offense was wildly inconsistent out there in Detroit.  We had a handful of drives where it looked like the second coming of "The Greatest Show on Turf".  I mean, look!

image.png.14ec1abbd8704accc6cb00442741c5bd.png

90, 92 and 75 yard TD drives.  That's amazing.

Then we had drives where we looked like, well, the Panthers.

image.png.6f36695f64cd4517be718c8f3b201357.png

Kicking wasn't the issue.  Offensive consistency was.

 

Graham Gano is the kicker who'll make the extra point in the first quarter, nail a 47-yarder before halftime to give you a 10-point lead, then miss two extra points and a 21-yarder in the fourth quarter. That's his career here in a nutshell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Gano has won far, FAR more games for us than he's lost.  It's not even close.  If we cut Gano, he'd be unemployed less than 24 hours.  He's one of the best kickers in the game today.

I know it sucks to hear that after we lost a game partly on his misses.  That doesn't make it any less true.  The real solution is to stop letting it come down to a kick or two.  Our offense was wildly inconsistent out there in Detroit.  We had a handful of drives where it looked like the second coming of "The Greatest Show on Turf".  I mean, look!

 image.png.14ec1abbd8704accc6cb00442741c5bd.png

90, 92 and 75 yard TD drives.  That's amazing.

Then we had drives where we looked like, well, the Panthers.

image.png.6f36695f64cd4517be718c8f3b201357.png

Kicking wasn't the issue.  Offensive consistency was.

 

5 points left on the board by Gano was the issue in a 1 point game (3 on his 35 yard miss, 1 XP miss, and one where we went for 2 but never would have had he not bricked his pants so hard).  We got down to fieldgoal range and needed momentum and he shat himself like a scared toddler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gano shouldnt be named in this thread.   He is more of a postive than negative for us.  Everyone gets to have a bad game.  Even kickers.  

this year he won us a game with a record kick and hadn't missed a FG leading up to that kick since when? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...