Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we get swept by the Saints or Falcons, shouldn't that be the nail in the coffin?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Getting swept by the Falcons who are possibly worse than us, should be

Getting swept by the Saints (that will be 5 losses to them in 2 seasons) should be

I'm not sure if missing the playoffs should be the final nail in the coffin, but you must win against your division point blank period. If you're not good enough compete and win against your rivals, you have to fire the coach and start over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HornetsSting said:

Get. This. Through. Your. Head. Our. Season. Is. Done. Final. Nail. Done. Playoff. Hopes. Done!

What does my thread have to do with playoffs?

This is about getting swept by Falcons or Saints should be the reason Ron Rivera lose his job if not for anything else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LA_Panther said:

Playoffs or not, sweep or not ... this team is trending in the wrong direction. We need some fundamental changes. We clearly have talent on offense. Even on D, we have people that we can build on like D-Jack and uhhh ...  I got no one else. Our D needs  some serious love 

This D isn't THAT far off. Add a legit pass rusher and a true centerfielder type FS and you'll see a world of difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This D isn't THAT far off. Add a legit pass rusher and a true centerfielder type FS and you'll see a world of difference.

This is why I am for blowing up the whole thing. This is as good as it gets. I’m not a knee jerk fire the coach kinda guy, but we need a different staff and a different attitude 

If you remember the 2001 season, we had many games where we just quit. The very next year, we went young and Jack Del Rio lit a fire into that unit and made them an elite D. The result was immediate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...