Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We've lost SEVEN games by a touchdown or less


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Second most in franchise history, I believe, trailing only this season's spiritual equal, the 2001 Panthers. Our last five losses were by a combined 20 points.

It is a crazy number... that's what makes me frustrated with some of the negative nancies...  I lived through 2001 and 2010... this is not it...

The pass rush needs upgrading, and Washington as DC was a bust 

Cams shoulder and lack of deep ball.

Those are the only things I worry about for next year.

The difference between 11-5 and 5-11 is not big in the NFL... 

Last year we overachieved... this year we underachieved.

Next year is next year... and as long as we get some pass rush and get Cam healthy we have a shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PhillyB said:

that's how football was lost back in my day

7-10 losses

back when football was REAL

-ron rivera

It’s actually crazy when you think of how many seasons we’ve had where success or failure was determined by 7 points per game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what happens when you have a gutless, spineless, limp dick, braindead, stuck-in-the-80s coach...  your games are decided upon a razor's edge.  It's why his coaching is outdated...  a single score decides whether he is a good coach or a bad coach, and he can't win in consecutive seasons, so what does that tell you?  Are the wins the norm, or are the losses the aberration?  If almost all of your games are decided by a single score, and you're hovering around .500 for your career besides one season your team caught lightning in a bottle and played out of their minds, i'd say that's a good sign that you have very little influence over your team's outcomes...

Which means, you suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Thats what happens when you have a gutless, spineless, limp dick, braindead, stuck-in-the-80s coach...  your games are decided upon a razor's edge.  It's why his coaching is outdated...  a single score decides whether he is a good coach or a bad coach, and he can't win in consecutive seasons, so what does that tell you?  Are the wins the norm, or are the losses the aberration?  If almost all of your games are decided by a single score, and you're hovering around .500 for your career besides one season your team caught lightning in a bottle and played out of their minds, i'd say that's a good sign that you have very little influence over your team's outcomes...

Which means, you suck.

Pretty much. Ron's philosophy has a slim margin for error. We consistently try to do just enough to win. We'll take the foot off the gas when we're rolling and then ask the D to try to hang on. Then he blames player execution if it doesn't work out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I miss when the close losses actually used to hurt.  

I haven't emotionally cared about a loss since after the Lions game.  Everything since has been numbing.  Probably won't see another Panthers win until 2019... which is sad to think about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Montsta said:

It’s actually crazy when you think of how many seasons we’ve had where success or failure was determined by 7 points per game. 

this is a direct result of the style of play Rivera plays though.  If you grind the playclock and limit total possessions, you're bound to have closer game games because each team has fewer possessions.  That IMO makes Rivera's inability to consistently pull out those victories even worse because he's the one setting that stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other issue with this is that you have a physically dominant QB who historically isn’t the most accurate, has the ability to take over a game other ways, but you’re forcing to be precise and have a small window for error. We continue to put Cam in situations where he has to save us, but not with his running. With his arm. Enter in the fact his arm is hurt, and the whole philosophy is asinine. Enter in the additional part where our HC is terrible at game/clock management and it’s one of the more ridiculous plans you can think of.

This is where the strategic part of being a coach isn’t there for Rivera. He is a ceteris paribus (“if all other things are the same”) coach, in a league where nothing stays the same. You have to recognize football is situational. 

There are only 3 certainties - death, taxes, and Luke Kuechly ballin the eff out IF you don’t give him a crappy DC.... which Ron did too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...