Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Edelman a HOFer?


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

For some reason people in the media are declaring that after Edelman’s MVP performance on Sunday he should be inducted into the HOF.

Dude is a clutch receiver and shows up in the post season but his career numbers don’t say HOF. I think it’s a freaking joke people actually believe he’s worthy.https://www.12up.com/posts/6289173-this-stat-proves-julian-edelman-s-hall-of-fame-case-is-an-absolute-joke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

El Oh No

The fact that this thought has ever run through anyone's mind is completely ridiculous.

Let's compare to Hines Ward who probably won't get in himself...

 

Hines Ward: 1,088 catches, 13,624 yards, 95 TDs, 1 SB MVP on a run first team

Edelman: 614 catches, 6,802 yards, 35 TDs and 1 SB MVP with GOAT coach in a pass friendly system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OriginalPantherDan said:

Hell no, not at this point in his career. Sure, he’s had some nice games, but he’s not alone in that category. Want to know who has more career receiving yards than Edelman? Brandon LaFell. ‘Nuff said. 

McCaffeey could have more yards from scrimmage after next season than Edelman has in over 10 years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even close. Great player for sure, but nowhere in the discussion for the HOF. With the NFL going more and more pass heavy it's going to take ridiculous numbers to even get in the conversation as a WR moving forward. I don't think Smitty has more than a 50/50 shot and Edelman is nowhere close to Smitty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...