Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Line or Defensive Line, the Next Step **


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Kinda in a little bit of a dead zone as we wait on the NFL Combine to commence, so with that said I've been mulling over the ''title'' the last several days. I'm not a huge college guy I tend to educate my self once the pre-draft workouts commence leading up to the draft as it's easier to key in on players at that point. 

I think in the first round it's obvious Offensive Line, or Edge are the targets given our current roster, the question then becomes what position to choose. The main thoughts on the OL are as follows:

  • Do we cut Kalil and just get that over with 
  • Will we extend Daryl Williams

Aside from those two questions the OL is in decent shape - Van Roten proved to at least be avg, Larsen has the experience needed to start at C and wasn't a huge drop off from Kalil, Turner is pro-bowl caliber, and Moton I believe most consider viable at either LT, or RT given his athleticism.  

When you take the DL into consideration, specifically the edge defenders we're looking at Mario Addison (who is dipping in productivity) then everyone else, Horton - UDFA, Cox Jr - UDFA, Obabda - UDFA, & Haynes a 4th rounder from last season. 

When you look at that group in comparison to the OL I think it's hard to argue that the ''edge'' position is the one that needs the most attention, and infusion of potentially elite talent on Day 1 of the NFL draft. Free Agency will go a long way in highlighting the path moving forward, but I would find it hard to pass on a premier rusher over offensive line in the first this year given the class we have coming out. 

I'd have no problem double dipping at OL in the 2nd, or later, but I think we can secure OL depth at least on the interior with free agency opportunities vs we all know legitimate pass rushers come at a higher premium on the open market. 

Baring this in mind, what are your thoughts on the 1st pick, and the position it should be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Daryl's knee checks out, sign him. Move Moton to LT. As we all know, quality OTs don't exactly grow on trees. We've been fielding trash at OT for years. We can't get cocky and let a quality young one walk. Look for interior OL in the draft. I'm a firm believer in paying OTs and drafting OGs.

We need to sign an impact pass rusher as a FA and then still add another one early in the draft. This is a deep DL/edge rusher class. I'd love to add both an edge rusher and a DT with two of our four picks in the first three rounds. In the perfect world, the other two picks would be a DB and an interior OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams will be the key in my mind.  If they don’t resign him I feel we need to go OL in the 1st.  The OT is not that deep this year. If we need a day one starter I am not sure I see that right now out of the 2nd round.  The Edge class on the other hand is deep. There will be a couple in the 2nd and high 3rd that could contribute this year.  Although some of those may be more a 3-4 OLB than a true 4-3 DE.  

The other option you guys are gonna hate. I for one am not counting out Speedbump McGee as our day 1 starter at LT.  Not because I have confidence in him but less confidence in our front office.  I could see them getting a developmental OT in the 3rd and riding Khalil at least to start the season until his “heathiest he has been in forever body”  fails again.  

Maybe someone in the front office should have considered OL in a extremely deep draft last year instead of drafting 50 reserve LBs and other project players.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Daryl's knee checks out, sign him. Move Moton to LT. As we all know, quality OTs don't exactly grow on trees. We've been fielding trash at OT for years. We can't get cocky and let a quality young one walk. Look for interior OL in the draft. I'm a firm believer in paying OTs and drafting OGs.

We need to sign an impact pass rusher as a FA and then still add another one early in the draft. This is a deep DL/edge rusher class. I'd love to add both an edge rusher and a DT with two of our four picks in the first three rounds. In the perfect world, the other two picks would be a DB and an interior OL.

To me, Moton played a lot better than Williams ever did at RT. Williams has had a lot of help from chips and TEs on his side and moton didnt. If we re sign Williams why not him at LT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roten is a backup.

Larsen to center.

Sign Williams for a decent deal. He’ll be offered more money elsewhere, be willing to let him go.

Cut Kalil.

DE and LT should be priorities in FA and draft depending on who is available.

Get the offense on the same page. Olsen and ex-Ryan don’t/didn’t need to be explaining plays in the huddle.

Larsen can play C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot will hinge on what we do on the OL. The DL is lacking but with one or two additions it can improve whereas the OL, depending on how you look at it, could need as many as three starters. 

If we cut Kalil, sign D. Williams and plan on keeping Larsen/Van Roten as starters, you are pretty much done except adding depth guys. If you cut Kalil, don't resign Williams and don't view Larsen/Van Roten as starters, then you need three starters.

If it were ME making those decisions, I would resign Williams so our tackle situation is settled(hopefully). Cut Kalil for cap. Pursue one of the free agent centers if they are available at a reasonable price, pursue a quality free agent guard if they are available at a reasonable price. If I strike out on both positions, look for a center and/or OG in the 2nd to 5th rounds to compete with Larsen/Van Roten. 

On the DL, I think it will largely hinge on whether they view DE and DT as dire needs. I suspect the team does not. Even so, we need to be adding someone to rotate in at DE and DT to replace Peppers, and be eventual replacements for Short, Horton, Addison, etc. I personally would not break the bank on the DE's available in free agency because I am not sure I view any of them as worth the price they will likely command. If an option exists to get a guy on a reasonable deal, that is obviously preferable to drafting a guy at 16 from an instant production standpoint. If not, we need to get young through the draft. There should be some really good options available in the 1st-4th round of the draft. If we are able to fill other major needs(OL, FS, LB) then I don't see a good reason we wouldn't double dip in those first four rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was all up on the OL. But now I worry Cam may not even be healthy enough to get resigned...or may even retire, or go to another team when his contract is up. This franchise  has used him in a bad way ever since he came here. I will repeat this team has treated him like a field slave and sacrificed all the moving parts of decent OL and receivers all these years. They just banked on his physical prowess as a means to neglect all those. 

Now suddenly he has weapons, but really no OL to protect his aging and injured self. And frankly even now I do not believe this franchise cares about him enough to put those parts around him NOW...knowing his contract will come up for extension soon.  I said it years ago at the end of his rookie deal..and I will again: I believe this franchise purposely didnt give him a decent oline then so his numbers would be less than stellar and help with negotiation is contract. Since then they have neglected him again and again season after season. 

I say roll DL. No point to invest in a good or even moderator elite OL after years of neglect and a banged up QB that might not even be able to finish a season....or willing to resign with us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I used to coach OL back in the day (High school) II  learned to watch the OL, not  the ball. While I am not sure about schemes, etc, I can tell you that Larsen was not real good--Van Roten  was hit or miss--basically average at the easiest position on the  OL to play. I like Van Roten's motor, frankly, so I expect him  to be  better this  season.  He needs a good player on each side  of him.  I would not enter the season with Larsen at C.

Personally, I would move Moton to LT, but I saw no indication that  the Panthers think he can play LT last year.  Another option--what if Williams is  a question mark and they are going to cut Kalil?  How much cap do you want to spend on Tackles who are not producing?  He has said he would test the market anyway.

We will know more in mid March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft/bestavailable
    • https://www.pff.com/news/draft-the-best-remaining-players-ahead-of-day-3
    • Per PFF: 1. CB Jermod McCoy, Tennessee Volunteers McCoy's medical evaluations will be critical, but based on his measurables and 2024 tape, he profiles as a first-round talent with shutdown potential in press-man coverage. 2. CB Keith Abney II, Arizona State Sun Devils Abney's lack of length and top-tier athleticism may limit him to zone schemes, but his competitiveness and run-defense mentality make him a valuable rotational defensive back with starter potential. 3. CB Keionte Scott, Miami (FL) Hurricanes Scott is a tone-setter in run defense with a physical mentality. His zone coverage is adequate, but man coverage limitations may restrict his role. 4. WR Skyler Bell, Connecticut Huskies Bell looked uncoverable at times against his level of competition in his final season and, despite below-average size and athleticism, produced like a top-100 prospect as a productive slot receiver. 5. WR Bryce Lance, North Dakota State Bison Lance dominated FCS competition as a versatile “X” receiver. He moves well for his size and pairs that with reliable contested-catch production, giving him a strong case as an early Day 3 pick with the potential to develop into a contributing NFL receiver. 6. ED Joshua Josephs, Tennessee Volunteers Josephs has an appealing blend of size and explosiveness but must improve his technique and anticipation to reach his potential. 7. ED Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State Nittany Lions Dennis-Sutton projects best as a 3-4 defensive end with some 4-3 flexibility. His length and size are clear strengths, though his agility in space is more limited. With ascending play, he could be drafted higher than his current tape suggests. 8. DI Gracen Halton, Oklahoma Sooners Halton is an undersized, versatile defensive lineman who wins with quickness, effort and movement skills. His lack of strength can be an issue, but he fits well in multiple or movement-based fronts. 9. HB Mike Washington Jr., Arkansas Razorbacks Washington brings alluring size, straight-line speed and yards-after-contact potential as a power back, but also noticeably good vision and footwork to be a potential early-down back in a committee in a man- or gap-scheme run game. 10. WR Elijah Sarratt, Indiana Hoosiers Sarratt may profile as a below-average athlete for an NFL “X” receiver, but there is still plenty to like in his game. His strong hands, coordination and determination at the catch point — combined with his constant competitiveness — give him starter potential as an outside WR2 in offenses that value jump-ball opportunities. 11. WR Deion Burks, Oklahoma Sooners Burks' size and production do not clearly point to a future NFL contributor, but his athleticism and strength make him difficult to dismiss. He offers intriguing upside as an explosive slot receiver, though he may not fit every scheme. 12. DI Darrell Jackson Jr., Florida State Seminoles Jackson is a massive, powerful defensive tackle with imposing physical traits. When his hand usage is right, he can be dominant, but inconsistency in technique and processing limits his impact. He remains a high-upside prospect. 13. C Connor Lew, Auburn Tigers Lew is a technically sound center with excellent leverage, balance and posture. His consistent fundamentals allow him to win positioning battles, though he can struggle against top-end power due to his lighter build. His upside is high given his age and technique. 14. LB Kyle Louis, Pittsburgh Panthers Louis is an undersized linebacker who projects best as a versatile space defender. In the right role, he can be an impact nickel player thanks to his explosiveness and coverage ability. 15. S Kamari Ramsey, USC Trojans Ramsey provides versatility with the ability to play both safety spots and the slot, particularly in two-high looks. His lighter build and good — but not elite — athleticism cap his ceiling. 16. CB Chandler Rivers, Duke Blue Devils Rivers logged 3,186 defensive snaps across four seasons at Duke and allowed just one touchdown in coverage in 2025, with a sub-85.0 passer rating when targeted for the third straight year. He earned a 90.7 PFF grade in 2024 before taking a step back in 2025. Over the past three seasons, he has been flagged just four times while playing more than 70% of his snaps on the outside. 17. C Sam Hecht, Kansas State Wildcats Hecht delivered a strong 2025 campaign, earning an 80.3 PFF overall grade that ranked fourth among centers. He brings a balanced profile, ranking 10th in PFF run-blocking grade (77.7) while holding up adequately in pass protection. Across 759 snaps, he allowed just seven pressures, with zero sacks and zero quarterback hits, and committed no penalties. 18. CB Devin Moore, Florida Gators Moore is an appealing Day 2 prospect with a strong blend of length, speed and ball skills for press-man coverage, though his injury history could impact his draft position. 19. G Jalen Farmer, Kentucky Wildcats Farmer put together a solid but unspectacular 2025 season, earning a 69.8 PFF overall grade that ranked 93rd among guards. His best work came in pass protection, where his 72.4 PFF pass-blocking grade ranked 256th, while his 67.4 run-blocking grade ranked 113th. Across 818 snaps, he allowed 14 pressures, including three sacks and no quarterback hits, and committed one penalty. 20. ED LT Overton, Alabama Crimson Tide Overton fits best as a 3-4 defensive end with inside-out versatility. He can contribute in a 4-3 as a power end, but his lack of bend and stride length limits his ability to consistently threaten the edge. 21. QB Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Tigers Nussmeier brings NFL bloodlines and a polished, foundational approach to the position, traits that fuel his confidence as a vertical pocket passer. However, his average arm strength and below-average stature could create challenges for his aggressive, gunslinging style at the next level. 22. DI Rayshaun Benny, Michigan Wolverines Benny earned a 79.3 PFF grade in 2025, ranking 62nd among 887 qualifying interior defenders. He posted a 68.5 pass-rush grade (161st) and an 83.5 run-defense grade (35th). His production leaned toward run defense, with a clear disparity between phases. 23. S Genesis Smith, Arizona Wildcats Smith has intriguing size and athletic traits for a single-high role, but inconsistency with physicality and play strength limits his reliability. 24. HB Jonah Coleman, Washington Huskies Coleman may not have the flashy athleticism of a fan-favorite RB1, but his game is efficient, powerful and translatable to NFL success, specifically behind zone-blocking schemes where he can gain momentum and one-cut into rushing lanes. He also brings plus third-down reliability as a receiver and pass protector. 25. LB Keyshaun Elliott, Arizona State Sun Devils Elliott has shown flashes as a downhill player, with effectiveness as a run defender and blitzer, but his below-average frame helps explain his limitations in coverage. He earned PFF grades of 67.8 in 2024 and 67.5 in 2025, which reflect a steady but unspectacular profile. His struggles in coverage may limit his role at the next level, though he still offers some starting upside in the right situation. 26. S Zakee Wheatley, Penn State Nittany Lions Wheatley is a long, springy athlete best suited for single-high roles. His slender build can be exposed in the box, but he offers strong range and coverage ability in space. 27. CB Malik Muhammad, Texas Longhorns Muhammad is a decorated cornerback from one of the nation's best secondaries, and his size and pedigree point to starting potential at the next level, particularly in a zone-oriented scheme. He earned PFF grades of 78.5 in 2023, 71.7 in 2024 and 70.8 in 2025. His lighter frame and limited disruptiveness remain concerns and may factor into evaluations despite the overall profile. 28. TE Michael Trigg, Baylor Bears Trigg may have one of the widest ranges of outcomes in the 2026 class. At his best, his vertical athleticism and contested-catch ability suggest top-50 potential, but inconsistencies with technique and focus create volatility in his projection. 29. DI Dontay Corleone, Cincinnati Bearcats Corleone, known as “The Godfather,” was one of the most dominant run defenders in 2022, using his size and strength to control the line of scrimmage. His performance has declined in recent seasons, and his 2024 medical history adds some concern. He offers rare quickness for a nose tackle and can control blockers despite shorter arms, though his pass-rush impact remains limited. He projects as a traditional 3-4 nose tackle. 30. T Dametrious Crownover, Texas A&M Aggies Crownover stands out for his massive frame at 6-foot-7 and 319 pounds with over 35-inch arms, which should earn him a look at the next level. However, he must translate those physical traits more consistently in pass protection to reach his potential. He earned a 58.4 pass-blocking grade in 2025 and allowed two sacks, two hits and 23 hurries across 428 pass-blocking snaps. 31. ED Anthony Lucas, USC Trojans Lucas has an NFL-ready frame and good overall athleticism for his size, but he does not consistently win quickly enough to project as a full-time edge rusher. His length and strength give him versatility across the front in odd schemes. 32. LB Deontae Lawson, Alabama Crimson Tide Lawson is undersized but experienced and quick. He projects as a rotational linebacker with some starting potential. 33. DI Kaleb Proctor, Southeastern Louisiana Lions Proctor, No. 111 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an unusual profile given his size and level of competition, but his explosiveness and pass-rushing ability stand out. His 2025 production supports that evaluation, as he earned an 86.5 PFF grade and generated 39 pressures, including nine sacks, four hits and 26 hurries. His performance against LSU in particular highlights his upside and reinforces his case as a potential late-round value. 34. CB Will Lee III, Texas A&M Aggies Lee, No. 114 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an intriguing developmental profile, as his size, length and leaping ability translate to strong ball skills. He earned a 66.5 PFF grade in 2025 after a stronger 76.2 mark in 2023, and he recorded eight pass breakups in each of the past two seasons. His run defense, tackling and penalty discipline remain areas for improvement, but the physical tools and ball production point to late-round value. 35. G Billy Schrauth, Notre Dame Fighting Irish Schrauth’s career included injury setbacks, but his play on the field showed a high level of performance for Notre Dame. He earned an 82.7 pass-blocking grade and a 73.1 run-blocking grade in 2025, and he did not allow a sack or a hit while surrendering just two hurries across 213 pass-blocking snaps. His game features strong pad level, a firm anchor in pass protection and good grip strength, though balance and foot speed present some limitations. The overall profile supports projection as a starting-caliber interior lineman. 36. WR Brenen Thompson, Mississippi State Bulldogs Thompson’s elite speed and big-play ability will draw interest, but his below-average size and inconsistent contested-catch rate complicate his projection. He ran a 4.26 40-yard dash, which ranks in the 100th percentile at the position, along with a 2.53-second 20-yard split in the 93rd percentile. In 2025, he caught 57 of 87 targets for 1,054 yards and six touchdowns, averaging 2.77 yards per route run and 4.3 yards after the catch per reception
×
×
  • Create New...