Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Minter & Hall of Honor

NJPanthers12

By NJPanthers12,
in Carolina Panthers

Mike Minter & the Hall of Honor  

78 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Mike Minter be Inducted

    • Yes
      48
    • No
      29

Recommended Posts

NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Still Brooklyn said:

If we just add names willy nilly, we'll need an entire stadium just for names. I don't even think Gross deserves it.

I was hoping to keep this conversation to just Minter, but I am curious. If you could start the HOH over from scratch with retired players only, who would you include ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Still Brooklyn Newbie

Still Brooklyn

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

I was hoping to keep this conversation to just Minter, but I am curious. If you could start the HOH over from scratch with retired players only, who would you include ?

First I'd remove the PSL fans, and McCormick or whatever his name is. Should be players only.

But ... Mills, Smith, and Kasay. Eventually Peppers. Luke and Cam down the road.

Minter, Walls, Kevin Greene, Gross, Thomas Davis, Jake, etc. all have great stories, but they just aren't top tier. Hell, I'd even consider saying no to Kasay as it defeats my criteria. Hoover deserves it but he's a FB and no one cares about FBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

I was hoping to keep this conversation to just Minter, but I am curious. If you could start the HOH over from scratch with retired players only, who would you include ?

The only players that aren’t still playing I would’ve included are Smitty and Pep. Walls and Gross are fine and great players but HoH should be a little more exclusive, otherwise it will just mean nothing at some point. TD once he’s done is a 100% no brainer and Cam and Luke are very likely, but otherwise there are no others currently that I’d consider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, Still Brooklyn said:

First I'd remove the PSL fans, and McCormick or whatever his name is. Should be players only.

But ... Mills, Smith, and Kasay. Eventually Peppers. Luke and Cam down the road.

Minter, Walls, Kevin Greene, Gross, Thomas Davis, Jake, etc. all have great stories, but they just aren't top tier. Hell, I'd even consider saying no to Kasay as it defeats my criteria. Hoover deserves it but he's a FB and no one cares about FBs.

I’m very surprised by the high standards. IF we were talking about retired numbers, I would agreee just 89 and 90. But the hall of honor should honor the best Panthers of all time. I think that includes Kalil, Muhammad, Rucker, Minter, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moo Daeng Experienced

Moo Daeng

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, t96 said:

The only players that aren’t still playing I would’ve included are Smitty and Pep. Walls and Gross are fine and great players but HoH should be a little more exclusive, otherwise it will just mean nothing at some point. TD once he’s done is a 100% no brainer and Cam and Luke are very likely, but otherwise there are no others currently that I’d consider.

How do you argue against Walls and his significance to the first chapter of the teams history ? Were you following the team then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

It seems like some are confusing the Panthers' HOH with the NFL HOF. Just Peppers and Smitty? Really???

Minter is a no for me and I love the guy. He's definitely the best safety in the organization's history, but then again that's kind of like being the tallest midget. I just don't see how a guy with zero Pro Bowls and zero All-Pros is in the HOH. Like I said, I love the guy and I won't complain a bit if he eventually gets in but I'd say no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...