Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Kawann Short and Gerald McCoy be considered the best DT duo...ever?


Saca312

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I was hoping (when I saw we signed McCoy) that it was a 2-3 year deal , but I am sure a series of 1 year deals serves our best interest as well.

Glad I got that off my chest.

For your vision to be realized, We need some productivity out of the NT position now more than ever.  If Poe and whoever is behind him step up, that could be very scary.  

If Poe commands a double as he should, KK, McCoy, and Luke are going to be huge.  Huge I say.

I’ll be happy if short and McCoy can play 13+ games. McCoy has an injury history.

looking at last year’s performance, McCoy will initially get the double teams. It’s up to KK and Poe to step up and beat their guys consistently. If they do, watch out QBs. 

At the very least, our run D is going to be a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Russell Shepard immediately comes to mind lol. All that bark and no bite in real games. 

Can you really compare the signing of a nobody like Russel Shepard, to the signing of a potential Hall of Famer in McCoy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Lumps said:

It’s poo like this that makes the huddle to up and down and look silly as hell, they haven’t played a single snap together and not they’re the best duo ever?

good lord people

Yeah I remember in 2006 people were coming up with nicknames for our d-line in the offseason before they even played a snap together.  "Southern Discomfort" and "Black and Blue Wrecking Crew" were two of the cringier ones if I remember correctly.  Of course they were good but that supposedly stacked team missed the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Yeah I remember in 2006 people were coming up with nicknames for our d-line in the offseason before they even played a snap together.  "Southern Discomfort" and "Black and Blue Wrecking Crew" were two of the cringier ones if I remember correctly.  Of course they were good but that supposedly stacked team missed the playoffs.

Speaking of which, what cringe worthy nicknames can we come up with for the current crop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both will basically be DE's now, soooo...

GOAT DT rotation in Panthers history so far was Jenkins/Buckner/Burton/Moorehead.

The whole line in 2003 was probably our best ever.

That said, our line this year could rival that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...