Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bradberry on Good Morning Football


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, CLG said:

Glad he is getting shine..can tell he is a good guy, but goodness this interview wasn't the most entertaining or informative lol. 

 

Resembles his temperament on the field definitely. 

he is the polar opposite of Josh Norman personality wise.  That last little dig at KK was funny though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy does not get enough credit for going up against some of the best receivers and QBs in the league in the NFCS. Sure INTS are the big measuring stick, but the whole story should include passes defensed and how good coverage keeps QBs from throwing against him. He's a big, physical DB, but he's a mighty smart one, too, and very much in the Chris Gamble mould. 

And Chris Gamble is the most underrated DB of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

He is. It’s a bit sad to hear how he impressed before the draft with his press on Wilks and how much he thinks of his ability there and then realize how many times we saw our CBs line up behind the first down marker.

Absolutely agreed. As good as he's been for us, we have to also realize that more often than not we've had him playing to his weaknesses and not to his strengths. I'd love to see us do more press and bail style coverage with him, similar to what Seattle does (or at least did during their "Legion of Boom" era).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Glad to see him getting some love. I feel like he's badly underrated by most fans and national media types because he doesn't get INTs.

Maybe he will change his style this season,big contracts need INTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 07579394 said:

Maybe he will change his style this season,big contracts need INTs.

His "style" is heavily based off of play calling and coaching. If we're calling for him to play 10 yards off then that's what it is. That's not his call. He's never going to develop Josh Norman or Richard Sherman type ball skills and hands. That's just not what he does. He gets a lot of pass breakups because he's a good cover guy, but virtually all of his INTs have been utter gifts. Like the old saying goes, there's a reason why he plays defense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rams since you beat them already and they are 0-2 on the road against NFC South teams.
    • Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
×
×
  • Create New...