Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goodell and refs to testify under oath about infamous no call


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

This definitely crazy. How many penalties in any game noticeable or unnoticabky can you call in any game? All cost a team a possession or potential points. Will everyone get a lawsuit cause every team has had non calls that could have won them the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darvinsun said:

This definitely crazy. How many penalties in any game noticeable or unnoticabky can you call in any game? All cost a time a possession or potential points. Will everyone get a lawsuit cause every team has had non calls that could have won them the game.

Let's not forget about the NFL carrying their sorry asses to a Lombardi for that post-Katrina feel good story all the while those filthy swamp rats were putting bounties on opposing players while Sean Payton ate pain killers like Skittles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what are they going to say? "Sorry, refs are human, they make mistakes, part of the game. Can't do anything about it.." 

Which is, of course, basically the email they send out every Monday during the season to teams about blown calls.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

As awesome as it is to see Saints fans cry  I wish Jerry Richardson and Charlotte would have stood up for Cam the way the game was rigged in SB 50. That game was called much worse.

You have to understand whether or not you're going to be able to actually win or whether you're just going to end up looking like a whiny douchebag. You gotta have an absolute smoking gun to be able to prove ref manipulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • see we are just not going to agree - unless you change your mind lol. Mine isn’t changing without hard evidence that Morgan supported it like a puppy dog.  He was the assistant. If he disagreed and said so, and they didn’t listen, he has to pick his battles. If he continued to oppose he is looking for work. He knows this stuff. I think he knows Bryce is a super long shot just because he faced NFL QBs and probably would have salivated at the thought of Bryce on the other side in his playing days.  Anyway I am going to judge him on what he has done since he’s been the man with the title.  I also would bet a stack that there were conditions placed on him and on Canales re Bryce Young. Can’t prove it. I am not supporting the Brooks pick, and rationalizing the XL pick. And rationalizing the Brooks pick to an extent, on the (assumed by me) mandate that was a condition of the hiring. Which was ‘sell out’ to make Bryce work. This year. Now. (2024) That is what those top two picks were.  IMO. They failed, id judged today.  I think Morgan is doing a great job really, once he got his feet under him and was allowed to do his job.  Fixing this team while accommodating Tepper/Bryce, more than a two year fix.    Anyhow I have beer to drink will check back later. 
    • Dolphins pass rushers Bradley Chubb and Jaelan Phillips: The Dolphins have received trade interest for both players, but could have an easier time trading Matthew Judon due to his more affordable contract
    • Saints WRs Chris Olave and Rashid Shaheed: While the Saints have maintained they don't want to trade their wide receivers, other teams are still monitoring their availability.
×
×
  • Create New...