Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tre Boston film breakdown.


Black&BlueBubba

Recommended Posts

Nothing entirely new. We know Boston was good in coverage and has good play-making ability but he takes bad angles and is not that great of a tackler. Hopefully the improve front 7 will keep him focus on coverage and keep him as the last line of defense in the open field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why drives me crazy is how he quits on stuff.  He did it with us in his first stint and you can see it twice in these vids with the chargers and cardinals. Once he realizes his angle is crap he just stops.  Wtf.  If you are gonna talk about how you are so good, then how about hustling.  That is something I have no patience for.  

I know he will bring some good plays to our defense.  But I can already see he still has those tendencies that will make me want to throw things at my TV when he just gives up on a play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my thing. Tre Boston is overrated. He was overrated before he left. Much like Charles Godfrey. But the thing is he is an upgrade over what we've had since he left and yeah he has learned and improved some. He wasn't worth what he was wanting on the nfl market. He was okay at best with the Chargers but he's better than Mike Adams and allows Golden to return to Tennessee where he belongs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

I really like the content the guy puts out.  Extremely solid!

Agreed.  It’s not just hype vids or talking about was just in an article we could read for ourselves.  This kid puts out new and unique content that moves the discussion forward.  Kudos to him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If our front seven can generate pressure, Boston will have a 2015 Kurt Coleman type of year for us. Both have the ability to ball hawk the middle of the field but are going to make you pull your hair out when you see some of the angles they take to try and make a tackle.

If Tre is generating turnovers the other 10 guys can help make up for his poor angles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a Gettleman vs. Hurney thing but just think in 2014 Boston was a 4th round pick that most people on here hated.  6 seasons later he and Turner (3rd round pick) are still starting and the 1st and 2nd round picks are not even in the league now.  That's why I have always thought it is better to have a lot of middle round picks than 3 or 4 in the first 2 rounds and then 1 or 2 for the rest of the draft.  You never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...