Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Haynes & Burns


Tbe

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Just because Haynes didnt have the numbers to snaps ratio.

He still got in the backfield consistently even if he didn't make the tackle

 

Burns is better though.

 

Haynes was very impressive for sure. Burns is just on another level. Can’t wait to see the starting Dline with him in it. Teams will give Burns a lot of attention which will open up holes for Haynes and others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

I think Burns will be a starter by the end of the season.  Haynes will be a good player in rotation.

While I expect Addison and Irvin to start I expect Burns to essentially get a starting snap count straight out of the gate. It wouldn't surprise me if he's getting a higher snap count than one or both of the previously mentioned guys by the end of the season. I'm still not sold on Addison's ability to drop into coverage while Burns already looks very fluid in that department. While Addison's physical talents may match up well with being a 3-4 OLB, we're still trying to teach an old dog new tricks with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Burns looks fast AF but let's see how he does against starters before we crown his ass

No crowning going on more like perspective and honest assessments our first rounder had two sacks in ten plays hats the F off to him. His potential is oozing off the charts he doing what we saw in training camp it seems to be transitioning over let’s see if it continues. But you gotta be honest that little shake with the TE one on one was outright disgusting it’s like he pounced on him from five yards away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was expecting Burns to dominate against the pass. didn’t expect him to play well against the run, nice surprise. Will be a beast, could we see numbers like Peppers had his first season?

Haynes got thrown around in the run game, just not strong enough. Will be a situational player and will shine against the pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Haynes was solid but Burns was better. Haynes’ sacks were against 3rd stringers based on it being the 3rd quarter. Our 3rd string OL was out there about the same time.

Also, Haynes still has a big problem with runs at him. He got tossed aside on the TD run right at him. Burns didn’t have enough snaps but from the preseason he definitely seems stronger and able to hold that edge on runs to him. I also think he’s a better pass rusher period.

Haynes first sack was in the 1st qtr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jfra78 said:

I think Burns will be a starter by the end of the season.  Haynes will be a good player in rotation.

The end of the season?  He keeps playing like this and he will be a starter by the first game of the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...