Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interested in trading for WR Laquon Treadwell??


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Well let's bring in a wide receiver that has 500 total yards in 3+ seasons.  That clearly is an upgrade.

Who said he's an upgrade over anyone in particular?  I'm just saying that there's plenty of space in the WR room.  We aren't loaded down with superstars.  My specific comment was directed at people who say "we don't need WR help".  Yes, we do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still not convinced that we're actually looking to do this, but on the surface it makes SOME sense. Norv was in Minnesota when they drafted Treadwell. Norv does have a history of preferring bigger WRs. Treadwell does fit a specific redzone target niche that we currently lack in our WR corps.

I wouldn't want to offer anything other than a conditional late round pick or a player who is on the bubble of our own roster either way though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm still not convinced that we're actually looking to do this, but on the surface it makes SOME sense. Norv was in Minnesota when they drafted Treadwell. Norv does have a history of preferring bigger WRs. Treadwell does fit a specific redzone target niche that we currently lack in our WR corps.

I wouldn't want to offer anything other than a conditional late round pick or a player who is on the bubble of our own roster either way though.

Isn't Treadwell in danger of not making their roster at all though?

Does it change your outlook if we can gey him without giving anything up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Isn't Treadwell in danger of not making their roster at all though?

Does it change your outlook if we can gey him without giving anything up?

Yeah, he probably is. Honestly, no not really since I'd only be willing to part with a conditional late rounder or bubble player of our own in a trade. If we want him, I'd be willing to do that type of deal to insure we get him rather than risk someone ahead of us claiming him on the waiver wire. It might impact my decision in the matter if he wasn't going to be subject to the waiver wire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

I never said he was better than DJ.  I said DJ was our best receiver and he only had 700 yards in receiving.  Your reply doesn't compute, homeboy.

Your comment implied that 700 yards was not good enough for a Wr  for us to feel comfortable with what we have

But that 700 yards came as a rookie  who's  Qb was hurt half way thru the season

While Treadwell has only put up 500 yards in his career because he sucks ..... keep up homeboy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...