Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Cam Newton is Overrated" - Stephen A Smith


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

I didn’t click on the video because I am honestly tired of people dogging him. He is a good kid but an easy target. People have to get ratings somehow I guess and he is a big name. I lost respect from Stephen A a long time ago. I don’t even watch that show because it’s agenda driven and he is a puppet. He doesn’t run that show, espn/Disney does . I rather watch undisputed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, falconidae said:

Matthew Berry, the fantasy guy at ESPN, told a story in one of his columns about one of the first times he did a show for ESPN, I think. He and a former player are rating players. 

The former player praised the first player they were going to discuss, Berry then agreed with him, saying the player was going to do great. The producer stopped the tape, and  did a retake. This time, the former player trashed the player, while Berry kept his same take.

It’s just like reality TV. It’s all scripted by producers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stephen A. Smith is an opinionated TV personality who likes to take controversial positions to gain recognition. His argument was the same tired one we have heard before about Cam. Yeah, he is a great athlete but he isn't a good pure passer.  Then he got schooled on the topic of who was better Andrew Luck versus Cam Newton. And if the numbers, longevity and total yards all favor Cam and we all would say that Luck was a good if not great quarterback when healthy, then how can Cam be considered overrated and not as good as Luck. That would make Cam underrated not overrated. I totally agree with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...