Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Rivera Dilemma


MHS831

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Zeek said:

The Dilemma is if Allen keeps balling out and Rivera/Hurney keep their jobs. Just means anther season of their idiotic crap and a mid-round draft pick.

If we make the playoffs and Allen is balling out, then I say keep the status Quo at that point and don’t fire anyone, why would we at that point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PanthersNC1984 said:

If we make the playoffs and Allen is balling out, then I say keep the status Quo at that point and don’t fire anyone, why would we at that point?

Would that prove anything regarding Hurn and Ron? Random success shouldn’t excuse incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Jeremy Igo

 

So what about Rivera now.  If this Cam injury is what it may seem now,  being pretty serious.  

 

Does Ron get another year pass?  I know Rivera takes a tkn of heat and deservingly so sometimes.  But how many teams lead their team to the playoffs with a backup QB outside of the Eagles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ncfan said:

@Jeremy Igo

 

So what about Rivera now.  If this Cam injury is what it may seem now,  being pretty serious.  

 

Does Ron get another year pass?  I know Rivera takes a tkn of heat and deservingly so sometimes.  But how many teams lead their team to the playoffs with a backup QB outside of the Eagles?

Ron gets a pass with the playoffs.

No playoffs, and the house is cleaned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Ron gets a pass with the playoffs.

No playoffs, and the house is cleaned.

Thats actually the "dilemma" that I thought this thread was going to be about.

I firmly believe that both Ron Rivera and Marty Hurney, though nice people, are bad at their respective jobs. Thus, them staying around longer is ultimately not a good thing.

With that said, I hate watching the Panthers lose and could never bring myself to hope that it happens, not even if that means being stuck with a leadership team that I believe will ultimately fail.

It's a b-tch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Yes.  Over a two game stretch they're right in line with Cam's best stretch (es).  Especially in the completion percentage and passer rating departments.

Yeah but it's the saints with nothing to play for and AZ has the WORST D in the league. But go on you're making a valid point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2019 at 2:42 PM, Varking said:

He also has a 7 td performance with no ints in there. Either way, those aren’t as good. Scoring 14 points is always better than 7 points. Scoring 7 is better than 0. Either way you slice it, it wasn’t “as good” as Cam during his best 2 game stretch. You are setting this kid up for failure by comparing him to Cams best. 

7 tds when?!?!?  You're just making stuff up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see what the controversy is. Cam is hurt right now. Until he’s back, really back, we have to roll with Allen.

2011-2016 Cam Newton can’t be compared to anyone. He was unstoppable, a sheer force of nature. He hasn’t looked so good in awhile. 

If and when Cam is healthy, and is 80% of what he was then he’s the starter, face of the franchise.

until then, Kyle Allen, Drew Brees looking understudy is the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...