Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Little (Revisited)


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Let's take another look at Greg Little.  Many of you wrote him off as a bust because he was overwhelmed at times during preseason.  As a former OL coach in high school, something that means little to nothing, allow me to pontificate:

1.  Little has the size, agility, and the measurables.  He is 6'5". 310, has 10 1/4 hands and his arms are 35 1/4 arms--you can't coach that.  It is the most most impressive group of numbers for any tackle in the draft.

2.  Here is the summary before the draft from NFL.com:

Little possesses the important combination of size, length and quickness as a prototypical left tackle prospect. While he wasn't asked to do it much in 2018, he has the athletic ability to handle zone-blocking duties, which could suit his skill-set more than a physical rush attack. Little is a natural bender with good feet and pepper in his punch as blind-side protector, but his average anchor and inconsistent body control create some concern. He will be an early starter at left tackle, but needs to improve his strength and eliminate his tendency to lean in order to reach the potential his physical and athletic traits offer.

MHS831:  Strength is his biggest concern.  He did not lift at the combine, and for an OL, that is a red flag.  He leans forward to gain leverage as you would if trying to stop a rolling car.  The stronger he gets, the less he will have the need to bend at the waist.  Imagine that car zigging or swimming over you once you lunged forward to stop it.  Little has not seen the speed he is facing, but I assure you, going against Addison, Burns, Haynes, and Miller in practice, will help.  He will still struggle at times, so temper expectations this year. I think his technique will be improved with reps and strength.  Watch him at the end of game--when he is tired, and you will see this issue more clearly.

Honestly, by year three, he should be a solid starting LT if he continues to develop.  There is one more thing:  He needs a stud LG beside him; at the moment, he does not.

Be patient with Little; he is a project.  If he were not, he would have been a top 10 pick for sure.  However, it was a solid pick, and we had little choice at that time.  Support him.  He will suck at times.  He will surrender sacks.  He will get burned.  And gradually, he won't. 

             

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, I think Van Roten isn't getting the credit he deserves. The guy's game is improving and the longer the line unit stays together as a group, the better they will work together. And Van Roten's ability to pull is really important.

Yeahh, Van Roten has been real solid. I'm not so sure Williams would be  a better choice. We'll see how Williams does at RG on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, I think Van Roten isn't getting the credit he deserves. The guy's game is improving and the longer the line unit stays together as a group, the better they will work together. And Van Roten's ability to pull is really important.

You are right--he reaches LBs well too.  We don't get much push from him in the run game on the left side, and he is a bit of a liability in pass protection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Car123 said:

Yeahh, Van Roten has been real solid. I'm not so sure Williams would be  a better choice. We'll see how Williams does at RG on Sunday.

Agreed.  I’m not sure if Trai is gonna play Sunday.  Little at LT and Williams a RG.  

If Williams performs well at RG we could slide him to LG for GVR.  But with that said I don’t think GVR is playing poorly.  

Larsen is the one that looked bad when replacing Trai.  He really has fallen off over the last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

You are right--he reaches LBs well too.  We don't get much push from him in the run game on the left side, and he is a bit of a liability in pass protection.

Which is the problem. Doing well at something that is only called for about 20% of the time doesn’t make up for being poor at the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Car123 said:

Yeahh, Van Roten has been real solid. I'm not so sure Williams would be  a better choice. We'll see how Williams does at RG on Sunday.

Let's see if Little and Van Roten work better together for a game or two, just to make sure that Van Roten wasn't be covered up for by Williams or taking the blame for him. 

Not saying Williams is a bad O-lineman, but he's out of place at LT and I'm not sure that he hasn't lost a step or two since the injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

    I am sorry. But, if Trai comes back this week, I am not sure Daryl sees the field. Unless they do that stupid trade series move again with him, and Little. Daryl still has a lot of trouble moving laterally. Hellz, he has a hard time moving at all. That knee is still bothering him. 

 

    Also, get off Van Rotens butt. He has been playing very well as of late. Stop parroting what others say. Use your own eyes. Then get back with me. I'll set ya straight I tell ya what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...