Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daley? Any thoughts on how he did?


musicman

Recommended Posts

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-week-6-team-of-the-week

PFF thought he was the best LT of the week.

“LT DENNIS DALEYCAROLINA PANTHERS

For a sixth-round draft pick making just his second start, it doesn’t get much better than this. Daley was impressive in pass protection, allowing just one hit from 36 pass-rushing snaps, and he really impressed as a run blocker, producing an 86.0 PFF run-blocking grade in the game.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bartin said:

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-week-6-team-of-the-week

PFF thought he was the best LT of the week.

“LT DENNIS DALEYCAROLINA PANTHERS

For a sixth-round draft pick making just his second start, it doesn’t get much better than this. Daley was impressive in pass protection, allowing just one hit from 36 pass-rushing snaps, and he really impressed as a run blocker, producing an 86.0 PFF run-blocking grade in the game.”

Damn. Very nice! We are really lucky. 

I know Ron was high on him in camp so I’m glad it’s working out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jacksonville and Tampa both have legit pass rushers. Daley has played really well. I’m not sure I give that job back to Little just yet.

However I’m also not at practice everyday but from a games standpoint it’d be hard to convince me that Daley should head back to the bench when Little is healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Jacksonville and Tampa both have legit pass rushers. Daley has played really well. I’m not sure I give that job back to Little just yet.

However I’m also not at practice everyday but from a games standpoint it’d be hard to convince me that Daley should head back to the bench when Little is healthy. 

Yeah I really wouldn’t know how to handle this one. Almost seems more difficult than the QB decision. If Little clears protocol, I would have a really hard time taking it away from Daley. But at the same time ideally the future on the left side is Little at LT and Daley at LG. Then again GVR has been solid too so are you going to bench him and put Daley at LG where he hasn’t played yet and is an unknown? What if Daley is the better LT but Little is a bad LG? Do you go with the best LT or the best combination of LG and LT? I think I’m rambling at this point and I haven’t even gotten into scenarios where Trai comes back and Little is still out and whether you put Daryl at LG in GVR’s place. I guess it finally feels nice to actually have more good OL than you actually need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Yeah I really wouldn’t know how to handle this one. Almost seems more difficult than the QB decision. If Little clears protocol, I would have a really hard time taking it away from Daley. But at the same time ideally the future on the left side is Little at LT and Daley at LG. Then again GVR has been solid too so are you going to bench him and put Daley at LG where he hasn’t played yet and is an unknown? What if Daley is the better LT but Little is a bad LG? Do you go with the best LT or the best combination of LG and LT? I think I’m rambling at this point and I haven’t even gotten into scenarios where Trai comes back and Little is still out and whether you put Daryl at LG in GVR’s place. I guess it finally feels nice to actually have more good OL than you actually need.

Dude get out of my brain! Why are we having the exact same thoughts? Also why am I yelling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m just glad we don’t have an injured super high priced long time veteran LT that we were debating should get his starting position back because between that and the Qb situation my debating brain skills can only take so much abuse 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Yeah I really wouldn’t know how to handle this one. Almost seems more difficult than the QB decision. If Little clears protocol, I would have a really hard time taking it away from Daley. But at the same time ideally the future on the left side is Little at LT and Daley at LG. Then again GVR has been solid too so are you going to bench him and put Daley at LG where he hasn’t played yet and is an unknown? What if Daley is the better LT but Little is a bad LG? Do you go with the best LT or the best combination of LG and LT? I think I’m rambling at this point and I haven’t even gotten into scenarios where Trai comes back and Little is still out and whether you put Daryl at LG in GVR’s place. I guess it finally feels nice to actually have more good OL than you actually need.

I’m not putting Daryl Williams on the left side of the line no matter what. Tackle or guard, it’s a definite no from me. 
 

Williams can serve as Turner’s replacement for the time being then can serve as the first back up in case Moton or Turner (again) goes down. 
 

But yeah, Daley... this isn’t like the QB situation because Little has only one game experience not 8 years with an MVP award. Is this Little’s second concussion or did his symptoms resurface from his 1st? Because if it’s his second that’s concerning moving forward. 
 

Our OL will get their toughest test after the bye week. We’ll definitely need all hands on deck. I think I’d stay with Daley and GVR for SF just due to them playing together the last two weeks and having developed a little more chemistry than Little and GVR. We can’t afford any little errors due to lack of playing time together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...