Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some love for......Chris Manhertz?


Bartin

Recommended Posts

LOL! What a completely forced poo take. Manhertz had two very nice blocks in that clip. On the rest of those plays, he was either coming in late to help out of a block that was already locked up or he was just there on the field and Baldy still somehow found a way to label him as THE guy who made the play successful.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

Here is Macs response.

I was going to start a thread because I though people were down on Manhertz.

What's the story here?

Was pretty surprised myself to see baldy breakdown on Manhertz with glowing praise which is why I titled it the way I did.

Im guessing that most are down on him because hardly anyone myself included really pays attention to what he does. He’s a TE who doesn’t catch passes so the only time you ever really hear his name is when he does something bad like get a penalty or miss a block.

So for us as fans 95% of the time we hear his name it’s for something bad when most of the time he is actually doing something good but we never hear about it. Naturally that would cause most to have a negative opinion of him.

I’m not going to pretend like I’ve been breaking down tape to say one way or the other but if someone like Baldy Who I respect is saying really good things about him then maybe he deserves more credit than he is getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

The giant gorge between Manhertz's blocking and Ian Thomas' blocking ability is a myth.  I payed particular attention to Thomas while Manhertz was out with concussion and he did more than admirably especially during the Jaguars game!

Yet Ian is playing the backseat. Despite being drafted to be Olsen's successor.  

Your viwe point doesn't have foundation to stand on. 

Ian Thomas will get his time, but let's not dog another player whom is out there busting his ass to have earned the bbn playtime he gets.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2019 at 1:15 PM, pantherclaw said:

Yet Ian is playing the backseat. Despite being drafted to be Olsen's successor.  

Your viwe point doesn't have foundation to stand on. 

Ian Thomas will get his time, but let's not dog another player whom is out there busting his ass to have earned the bbn playtime he gets.  

How am I dogging Manhertz?  Manhertz missed time and Ian Thomas played really well.  I spoke on that.  They always say that Manhertz gets the snaps because he is such an excellent blocker, but the gap between him and Thomas hasn't looked to be that big when Thomas gets to play.  Look at how many times people have sit behind other players throughout NFL history when they could be playing.  I was just pointing out that the kid can play.  I never said that Manhertz is a JAG, or that he has never been a reliable receiving threat.  Now that would be dogging.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...