Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at 49ers Gameday Thread


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, gmonjimbo said:

It is probably going to take 11 wins to make the wildcard in the NFC this year. We have 2 games against the Saints, then Packers and Seahawks. We have to split those 4 games in order to make the playoffs. The Panthers best hope IMO is Cam coming back 100%. Allen is not dynamic enough, he needs the defense and CMC to play unreal to give us a chance in these types of games.

This team won’t be close to Making the playoffs.  10-6 or 9-7 won’t make it and we may not even finish 9-7.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AffirmativeAction said:

Suit up the super "down low" negroid.  He can block, play d, have a white man explain the plays to him, and toss 30ft overthrows.  He did win an affirmative action MVP once, got carried to the super bowl and was too dainty to dive for a fumble.  The Great Black Hope.

Just remember the good times.

Like 4:04 PM today when you thought Kyle Allen was a good quarterback and had taken the starting job from Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cookie Lyon said:

Shouldn't you be at your Klan rally?

Racist asshole.

When racists like that start showing up and immediately spouting that kind of obscene ignorance it shows just how out of hand the mods have let things get the past few months.

Very bad look for Igo and the huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...