Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In hindsight, should Rivera/Hurney have been retained for the 2019 season.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I was a big advocate for regime change top to bottom in January. Get rid of all coaches and start a policy of no nepotism within the organization. 

 

Fast forward to today, where would we be without Rivera/Hurney but instead a new coach that isn't on the hotseat?

Would we have a better backup QB situation?

Would Cam's injury have been treated better? 

Would the team have more energy and excitement?

 

What say you? Would we be better or worse off than we are now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if new coach said week 1 Cam you are going to sit out the next few games, Allen will start.  That would be the right move.  There are coaches better than Ron and then there are much worse coaches than Ron. I’m sorry Atlanta, you went 1-7 with a team that is much better than the other tank bowl contenders. Your coach sucks. 

Hurney made a draft that looked good in preseason and pretty good in regular season - when they had a chance to play.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we would be better off without Rivera for sure. To me as someone who supported him for a long time and then gradually moved onto the fence, this season has just largely been confirmation of my doubts about his limitations. He is an average NFL HC, nothing more, nothing less. He has his strengths but his weaknesses have left him unable to grow and adapt much over time.

Hurney I am less sure needs to go. Paradis aside, his 2.0 tenure seems pretty strong. Not perfect but he does seem to have learned from his mistakes of the past. I would be more willing to let him continue for the time being if I were Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My answer to that is probably going to be obvious.

Rivera has been here too long and it just isn't working. Hurney isn't a long-term solution because the longer he's here, the worse it gets.

You absolutely can't keep the two of them together because they just aren't a winning combination and I absolutely don't want Marty picking our next head coach.

Still hoping for Kevin Colbert at GM and Dan Campbell at head coach. If we only get one or the other, could still be okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still not ready to predict what's going to happen this offseason. I know what I feel should happen.

Jourdan Rodrigue has said that up to now, Tepper has been concentrating on the business side of things. This year he plans to concentrate on the football side, so that's something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jus Rob said:

True we get new coaches its another 2-3 years before we can be playoff contenders. New offense for our Qb to learn. 

It might not be that dire or might not have been that dire but we don't know, either. The assumption is that it would have been magically better without Rivera and Co. but we honestly don't know if that would be or WILL be the case.

Ultimately moving on to me is about the realization that Rivera just can't get it done anymore. Before the "Riverboat" transition, he was well on his way to getting fired anyway. That SB run bought him enough time and I think it has been enough time. Moving on will make sense with or without Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...