Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I would fire Hurney just for this


NAS

Recommended Posts

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/12/05/harrison-butker-is-the-afc-special-teams-player-of-the-month/

The Chiefs have solidified their lead in the AFC West over the last few weeks and kicker Harrison Butker has helped them do that.

Butker hit a game-winning field goal to knock off the Vikings in Week Nine and has made 10-of-11 field goals and 12-of-13 extra points since the start of November. He’s made all five of the field goals he’s tried from at least 40 yards and posted the second most points in the league over that period despite only playing four games over the last five weeks.

The NFL announced on Thursday that Butker has been named the AFC’s special teams player of the month. He was named the conference’s special teams player of the week after the Vikings game.

Butker is 25-of-29 on field goals and 37-of-39 on extra points over the course of the entire season. He’ll be in New England with the rest of the Chiefs on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Car123 said:

Firing a GM because of a kicker is pretty stupid.

Are you kidding me?  It was obvious to all of us who the better long term solution was for the team when the move was made.  Games are won and lost because of kickers.  Just look at the past three seasons if you need a refresher of how many games we lost due to our kicker sucking in crucial moments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only flaw I see in that line of thinking is I believe Rivera and probably the special teams staff had a large influence on which kicker we kept.

Hurney does not strike me as the type to make full blown decisions like that without input from his Head Coach. Could he have over ruled Rivera? Yes I assume so. In this case should he have? Yes he should have. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NAS said:

Are you kidding me?  It was obvious to all of us who the better long term solution was for the team when the move was made.  Games are won and lost because of kickers.  Just look at the past three seasons if you need a refresher of how many games we lost due to our kicker sucking in crucial moments.

Gano also won us a lot of games. All kickers miss crucial kicks at some point. Butker had a key miss in the playoffs that cost the Chiefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I’m skeptical about Hurney. It’s clear this was Rivera. His favoring of vets/talent evaluation (putting the best player on the field) and whole ‘go out on their own terms’ has screwed over the team on numerous occasions and is well documented, so much so it was regarding by many people as one of his biggest hinderances as a head coach.

No doubt in my mind Rivera would take Gano over Butker every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tape we had on Butker *at the time* was limited to a rookie kicker in preseason.  Yes, he made kicks.  Guess what?  So did Slye.  This is why veteran kickers are valuable.  You know what they are.  If you looked at Slye over the first few games, he looked fantastic.  Now?  Not so much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panther4life said:

The only flaw I see in that line of thinking is I believe Rivera and probably the special teams staff had a large influence on which kicker we kept.

Hurney does not strike me as the type to make full blown decisions like that without input from his Head Coach. Could he have over ruled Rivera? Yes I assume so. In this case should he have? Yes he should have. 
 

good point.  we all know ron likes to keep vets who have "paid their dues" instead of younger, more talented players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a whole laundry list of reasons I'd rank above making a bad call on a kicking situation.

One recent one that sticks out is the Short restructure. He's a declining, aging player with a huge contract. He's the exact type of player you DON'T kick the can down the road on to commit more future guaranteed money. Restructures save money on that cap in the short term by spreading  that bonus hit out at the massive cost of greatly reducing cap flexibility. Short is the type of player who should be being evaluated to be a cap casualty and Hurney's classic restructure just made that a much tougher pill to swallow.

It's the exact type of move that got him into cap hell his first go around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's a whole laundry list of reasons I'd rank above making a bad call on a kicking situation.

One recent one that sticks out is the Short restructure. He's a declining, aging player with a huge contract. He's the exact type of player you DON'T kick the can down the road on to commit more future guaranteed money. Restructures save money on that cap in the short term by spreading  that bonus hit out at the massive cost of greatly reducing cap flexibility. Short is the type of player who should be being evaluated to be a cap casualty and Hurney's classic restructure just made that a much tougher pill to swallow.

It's the exact type of move that got him into cap hell his first go around.

I agree, this was a far more fireable offense, but equally as stupid.

It's very classic Hurney on both of these moves.  No regard for the future of the franchise, it's always only about the year in which you stand.

DG drafted Butker to take over for Gano so he would have a cheap, young kicker signed long term.  Hurney kept Gano, even though his contract was expiring, to satisfy Ron's insistence on veteran players.  KK and Trai's restructuring was all about this year, with no regard toward the teams future ability to maneuver if one of them got hurt, regressed, or we needed to rebuild.

Well, 1 of them got hurt, 1 of the regressed, and the team has to rebuild....Hurney didn't consider any of then when making that move.

Incompetent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...