Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Seahawks .... What do you know>?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Lol

seahawks 48. Panthers 13

Seahawks need this game   

allen inexplicably throws 4 interceptions and fumbles twice 

I’ll be on a golf course in CA and not at BofA and for once not invested

the players aren’t...they checked out before the Rivera firing

ive lived through some pretty atrocious Panthers seasons.  Don’t need this one. Didn’t have to be this way if Ron and Hurney got a decent backup in here.   But,  you know, they were ‘happy with who they have’.  Meanwhile Tannehill sure is doing great in Tennessee 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know they are better than us and I know Pete the Cheat Carroll is a shitbag. 
 

I also know that there is a good chance this game will be over by halftime and I will be going on about my day with yard work and chores around the house. 
 

just get this season over with already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I know they are better than us and I know Pete the Cheat Carroll is a shitbag. 

He is, but you can't argue with the results. Just a few years ago the Seahawks were all but done and their window had been declared slammed shut. But they retooled and evolved, now they are back in it and ready to compete for the conference championship.

Meanwhile Ron Rivera who had Cam Newton and Luke Kuechly in their prime is now unemployed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...