Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Curtis Samuel is not killing drives


Icege

Recommended Posts


The next time somebody tries to tell you that Curtis Samuel is part of the problem, do a little post history browsing. If you see them propping up Kyle Allen and/or whining about Shaq/Reid/Bradberry, just put that user on ignore. They're not interested in facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DominoCollege said:

anyone that judges a player based on the knucklehead posters around here deserves what they get.  Maybe I am missing something, but are you posting that people should not judge a player based on what x poster here says about them? Like, OMG, like...who does that? Becky...look at her butt

On 12/9/2019 at 11:07 AM, DominoCollege said:

This team used Cam's ability as a "running" QB ( it means...hes black and big and strong) as a way to neglect the OL.  People have been banned for being this honest. 

Case in point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CS's problem is our perception of him.  We want to see him as the next Steve Smith / Muhsin Muhammed.  He's not.  CS is Ted Ginn.  Full stop.

image.thumb.png.95f4b9309f64c7530e89526b84f867d7.png

Targeted air yards 15.1 vs 15.5 . . . catch percentage 51 vs 54 . . . cushion 6 vs 7 . . . the list goes on.  Curtis Samuel is Ted Ginn.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curtis Samuel is one of the softest WRs on the field on game day. That is his biggest problem.

I don't care all that much for Kyle Allen, and like the things that Shaq, Bradberry, and Reid (national hero) do most of the time, and I'd still say what I said in the original sentence to Curtis' face.

He shies away from contact 99% of the time, body catches and gets alligator arms when balls are catchable, and his biggest asset is his speed, which does very little for him in this offense.

He needs to toughen up, take some hits, and not look to hug the sideline any time he gets the ball near him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bronn said:

Curtis Samuel is one of the softest WRs on the field on game day. That is his biggest problem.

I don't care all that much for Kyle Allen, and like the things that Shaq, Bradberry, and Reid (national hero) do most of the time, and I'd still say what I said in the original sentence to Curtis' face.

He shies away from contact 99% of the time, body catches and gets alligator arms when balls are catchable, and his biggest asset is his speed, which does very little for him in this offense.

He needs to toughen up, take some hits, and not look to hug the sideline any time he gets the ball near him.

Yeah I’m not sure what his deal is this year. Because in the past he definitely did not shy away from contact and wasn’t afraid to put his body out there to make a catch (hence the broken foot).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Bronn said:

Curtis Samuel is one of the softest WRs on the field on game day. That is his biggest problem.

 

I can't agree with that there being he was a RB in College.  That characteristic just can't stick with someone who's use to getting tackled by 300lb linemen.  I think if Cam were healthy this year, we'd have seen Curtis get a better chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dunn said:

I can't agree with that there being he was a RB in College.  That characteristic just can't stick with someone who's use to getting tackled by 300lb linemen.  I think if Cam were healthy this year, we'd have seen Curtis get a better chance. 

It’s noticeable this year. Prior years no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Curtis Samuel is the WR2 on a team that lost its starting QB, has no offensive line and has been playing basically a rookie backup QB.

It's easy for some basement dwelling hot-taker to call him trash... they don't have to look at or even understand the situation. 

I give @Forty-Eight as an example.

 

Just wait until we draft a Jerry Jeudy, CeeDee Lamb, Henry Ruggs, or Tee Higgins in the 1st or 2nd. Samuel will then be the 4th WR behind Wright. Y’all can love him or suck him all y’all really want. The fact is Samuel won’t be getting a second contract from this team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In reality that tells you all you need to know about how bad the Oline is. We need new trenches on both sides. I think Samuels problem is more understanding the game than catching the ball. He runs way to many sloppy routes and doesn't understand where to be too much. Moore on the other hand has done really well with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...