Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tony Elliott declines interview with Carolina


ellis

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, bobowilson said:

I'm supposed to believe the 39year old runnings back coach of Clemson turned down an interview to make tens of millions of dollars as a head coach in the NFL

 

Probably didn't want to be the token Rooney rule interview

People he knows probably told him he wasn't a serious candidate

I've seen this being reported  over the years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its great to know that Tepper is reaching into all areas to uncover the next coach.  Elliott’s is making a big mistake if he thinks this is merely a Rooney Rule interview.  Tomlin had one year DC experience when he basically came out of nowhere and blew the Rooneys away.  IMO this is exactly the type of candidate that Tepper is trying to find. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bobowilson said:

I'm supposed to believe the 39year old runnings back coach of Clemson turned down an interview to make tens of millions of dollars as a head coach in the NFL

 

He isn’t the RB coach. 

He is the co-OC

all coaches don’t go for “promotions” just because.   Because a lot already have good jobs and don’t want to run out the door to potential bad spots for them. 

Look at Clemson’s DC for example.  Arguably the best DC on all of college football.  Dude could of been a HC years ago if he wanted it.  

I’m not actually buying this story.  Panthers still have to find a way to check off the Rooney Rule and Elliot might be looking to do some PR for himself and start building his name as the other OC just took at HC gig. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...