Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tony Elliott declines interview with Carolina


ellis

Recommended Posts

I think Tepper was being genuine in asking him to interview. If it was just to check the box he had Fewell to fulfill that. Hes also asked to interview Bieneimy and likely Shaw. Elliott may have been a long shot but you never know where that could lead. If not with us maybe an advanced position in college if not pros. 

It sounds like both Shaw and Bieniemy are highly qualified. I'm not sure I have a favorite but would not be upset at all with either if they were to impress in interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

I think Tepper was being genuine in asking him to interview. If it was just to check the box he had Fewell to fulfill that. Hes also asked to interview Bieneimy and likely Shaw. Elliott may have been a long shot but you never know where that could lead. If not with us maybe an advanced position in college if not pros. 

It sounds like both Shaw and Bieniemy are highly qualified. I'm not sure I have a favorite but would not be upset at all with either if they were to impress in interviews.

Given how bad Carolina bombed with Fewell taking over? 

Tepper would catch hell pretending like that was a real interview. 

Rooney rule has a lot of good and bad elements to it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Given how bad Carolina bombed with Fewell taking over? 

Tepper would catch hell pretending like that was a real interview. 

Rooney rule has a lot of good and bad elements to it 

Fewell would satisfy the Rooney Rule, as would Eric Bieniemy.

I doubt this was just to check the box on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Given how bad Carolina bombed with Fewell taking over? 

Tepper would catch hell pretending like that was a real interview. 

Rooney rule has a lot of good and bad elements to it 

I think you missed my point.  Hes more than fulfilled that requirement and I don't see anything in Tepper to think he's not genuine in asking for the interview .

I guess I understand Elliotts angle too but it could help him advance his career at the least.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I think you missed my point.  Hes more than fulfilled that requirement and I don't see anything in Tepper to think he's not genuine in asking for the interview .

I guess I understand Elliotts angle too but it could help him advance his career at the least.  

How has he fulfilled that requirement? 

I'm an Elliot guy.  I can see multiple reasons for him declining the interview.   Every coach isn't in a rush to just land a perceived promotion.  Big picture matters.  I think Elliot's future is in the college ranks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...