Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading up for Burrow what would it cost?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/news/2020-nfl-draft-who-could-trade-up-for-joe-burrow-at-no-1-and-what-such-a-move-would-cost/

 

What would it cost? 

Hill: No. 7, 38, 69, 2021 first and 2022 first for No. 1.

Traditional: No. 7, 2021 first and second for No. 1

Meers: No. 7 and 38 for No.1

What's the likelihood it happens?

A lot will depend on who the Panthers hire to replace Ron Rivera. If it's, say, Ravens offensive coordinator Greg Roman, he might want to stick with Newton given the success he has had with Lamar Jackson, and before that, Colin Kaepernick in San Francisco. If it's someone else and they want to start fresh with "their" quarterback, moving up for Burrow is a more realistic possibility, assuming Tua doesn't declare and that they don't consider Herbert a top-10 pick. We would put the chances at 35 percent.

In our latest mock draft, we had the Panthers taking wide receiver CeeDee Lamb.

I am not*in favor of taking a qb. This is just a hypothetical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can fix the O/Line with a good LG or LT and Center selection in this years draft.  We weren't even holding teams out of the backfield for a 3 second count and you were expecting us to pass.  There was no stepping up into the pocket cause it was collapsing when they did or a rusher was plowing through to the QB.  Give our QB's time to throw and we could have won more games this year even as poorly as the defense played.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything other than a concentrated effort to fix the oline through draft and FA and even coaching hire will make whoever takes snaps under center next year irrelevant. If it is Cam, he will have a slim chance indeed of making it through the season without further injury with our line as presently constructed. If it is a rookie, the risk of wasting said rookie's potential and leaving them shell shocked a la David Carr is high. If this season made anything abundantly clear, it is that our oline must be addressed first or who is under center won't matter much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This board reminds me of the pre-Cam draft cycle

"ugh we have too many holes we can't go worrying about getting a franchise QB, go get Fairley!!!"

it's remarkable how this stupid notion won't just go away despite the overwhelming makeup of the league.

 

If you have a chance to get a franchise QB, you get one. Lol at obsessing over whose going to anchor your LG spot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Ditka was coaching the Saints, he gave his entire draft for a RB (Williams) and a first and a third the next year to move from #12 to #5.

Cincy ain't giving up on Burrow unless the whole farm is on the table.

Traded to New Orleans

Traded to Washington[13]

  • 1999 first round pick (12th overall, later traded to Chicago, used to select Cade McNown)[14]
  • 1999 third round pick (71st overall, later traded to Chicago, used to select D'Wayne Bates)[14]
  • 1999 fourth round pick (107th overall, used to select Nate Stimson)[15]
  • 1999 fifth round pick (144th overall, later traded to Chicago, used to select Khari Samuel)[16]
  • 1999 sixth round pick (179th overall, later traded to Denver, used to select Desmond Clark)[15]
  • 1999 seventh round pick (218th overall, later traded to Denver, used to select Billy Miller)[15]
  • 2000 first round pick (2nd overall, used to select LaVar Arrington)[13]
  • 2000 third round pick (64th overall, used to select Lloyd Harrison)[13]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

When Ditka was coaching the Bears, he gave his entire draft for a RB (Williams)

Cincy ain't giving up on Burrow unless the whole farm is on the table.

Yeah, but I don't think they had a first rounder, IIRC...and it was actually the Saints.  To compensate, they had to give up the remainder of what they had in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...