Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can anyone dispute this


therealmjl

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mjligon said:

there are some facts in there including the awful loss in the bowl game against georgia's scrubs and that OU game dispute that.

One could argue that UGAs "scrubs" could be on par with the team Baylor had on the field from a talent/recruiting standpoint. 

As for "flops", look no further than both McDaniels and Stefanski this past weekend. All coaches have their ups and downs....fans choose the narrative that best fits their agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you guys serious???  He took a team shrouded in scandal and were at rock bottom, and in his third season, has a team that takes OKLAHOMA (top 5 team most of the year) to the woodshed for a half--and you see it as a negative?

Oklahoma was a double-digit favorite in that game.  What is the point here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Ah yes, a writer for a mediocre sports website telling me why a successful college coach doesnt deserve to be in the NFL... 

Must watch. 10/10.

-Blew a 28-3 lead against OU at home.

The only ranked team he played

-5 wins by 1 score

-2 wins in OT.

-Blown out by Georgia's backups in the Sugar Bowl. 

Facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

One could argue that UGAs "scrubs" could be on par with the team Baylor had on the field from a talent/recruiting standpoint. 

As for "flops", look no further than both McDaniels and Stefanski this past weekend. All coaches have their ups and downs....fans choose the narrative that best fits their agenda.

this "Georgia scrubs" narrative is so dumb.  Yes, a couple UGA players sat out the bowl game, but it is not as if they were lacking in starting players on that team... Fromm, Pickens, LeCounte all had huge impacts and were marquee names on that team.

and that's not to mention that Baylor finished the game with its 3rd string QB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mjligon said:

there are some facts in there including the awful loss in the bowl game against georgia's scrubs and that OU game dispute that.

It's a terrible article written poorly. You can cherry pick bad games by any coaching hire.

Quote

 

-5 wins by 1 score

-2 wins in OT.

 

Those aren't bad things. He wins close games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Are you guys serious???  He took a team shrouded in scandal and were at rock bottom, and in his third season, has a team that takes OKLAHOMA (top 5 team most of the year) to the woodshed for a half--and you see it as a negative?

Oklahoma was a double-digit favorite in that game.  What is the point here? 

Atlanta took New England to the woodshed for 3 quarters. 28-3 wasn’t it? Who won that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Happy Panther said:

It's a terrible article written poorly. You can cherry pick bad games by any coaching hire.

Those aren't bad things. He wins close games.

Things that typically don’t roll over to the next year. One year you win the close ones, the next you don’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...