Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can anyone dispute this


therealmjl

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mjligon said:

there are some facts in there including the awful loss in the bowl game against georgia's scrubs and that OU game dispute that.

One could argue that UGAs "scrubs" could be on par with the team Baylor had on the field from a talent/recruiting standpoint. 

As for "flops", look no further than both McDaniels and Stefanski this past weekend. All coaches have their ups and downs....fans choose the narrative that best fits their agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you guys serious???  He took a team shrouded in scandal and were at rock bottom, and in his third season, has a team that takes OKLAHOMA (top 5 team most of the year) to the woodshed for a half--and you see it as a negative?

Oklahoma was a double-digit favorite in that game.  What is the point here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Ah yes, a writer for a mediocre sports website telling me why a successful college coach doesnt deserve to be in the NFL... 

Must watch. 10/10.

-Blew a 28-3 lead against OU at home.

The only ranked team he played

-5 wins by 1 score

-2 wins in OT.

-Blown out by Georgia's backups in the Sugar Bowl. 

Facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

One could argue that UGAs "scrubs" could be on par with the team Baylor had on the field from a talent/recruiting standpoint. 

As for "flops", look no further than both McDaniels and Stefanski this past weekend. All coaches have their ups and downs....fans choose the narrative that best fits their agenda.

this "Georgia scrubs" narrative is so dumb.  Yes, a couple UGA players sat out the bowl game, but it is not as if they were lacking in starting players on that team... Fromm, Pickens, LeCounte all had huge impacts and were marquee names on that team.

and that's not to mention that Baylor finished the game with its 3rd string QB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mjligon said:

there are some facts in there including the awful loss in the bowl game against georgia's scrubs and that OU game dispute that.

It's a terrible article written poorly. You can cherry pick bad games by any coaching hire.

Quote

 

-5 wins by 1 score

-2 wins in OT.

 

Those aren't bad things. He wins close games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Are you guys serious???  He took a team shrouded in scandal and were at rock bottom, and in his third season, has a team that takes OKLAHOMA (top 5 team most of the year) to the woodshed for a half--and you see it as a negative?

Oklahoma was a double-digit favorite in that game.  What is the point here? 

Atlanta took New England to the woodshed for 3 quarters. 28-3 wasn’t it? Who won that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Happy Panther said:

It's a terrible article written poorly. You can cherry pick bad games by any coaching hire.

Those aren't bad things. He wins close games.

Things that typically don’t roll over to the next year. One year you win the close ones, the next you don’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...