Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's formally divide into factions on Matt Rhule


Gesualdo

Recommended Posts

The Gettleman/Hurney struggle was for real, and the Rivera wars were a blast. But far too much nuance and in-betweenery was permitted in those elemental battles for truth. 

You have to choose now.

Don't say "I'm a Panthers fan first...I'm going to reserve my judg-" --- STFU! It's just a message board. We're drawing lines and taking sides this time, so we can properly sh*t on each other later for being right or wrong.

Record your opinion for posterity: Are you a Rhuler or a Drooler? No hedging. We'll bump in a year and reassess.

I'm a Rhuler.

This is our anthem, "Rhuler of My Heart":

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoPanthers123 said:

We are stuck with him for how many years, so I’ll see what he can do before making blindfolded bets.

We are not stuck with him in any way....

....Rhule is on a series of 1-year renewable deals at Big Tepp's discretion....

....Rhule produces, he stays.  Stinks up the join, he's a goner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m cautiously on team Rhule

As a person, I really like the guy. He seems like someone who can lead and players and staff will follow. Seems genuine to me. 

As a coach, I’m very curious. I’ll say this. If nothing else, his appointment indicates a true change of philosophy for this organization. He isn’t the safe choice. He is an unknown for the NFL. 

I think he will be successful but I admit that’s more based on his interviews than his track record. He’s done some great things in college but it’s a small sample size and the NFL is a very different beast anyway.

I feel if he gets a confident backing from Tepper and some experienced coordinators then he’s very capable of doing big things for this team. Time will tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...