Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what Saints and Falcons fans are saying about the Rhule hire

TheRumGone

By TheRumGone,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

I always find it interesting to read opposing fans perspectives on other teams coaching hires or player acquisitions/draft.

so some are obviously laughing we gave Rhule 7 years and 60 million. But I found these tidbits to be fun to read. I’m just trying to be optimistic as well.

By far the best coach they’ve had in years. Depending on the staff he gets, they’ll be on the up and up soon

I’ve been a Baylor fan for 35 years. If this is true, he’s dead to me. They can have him.

Panther somehow made a solid move.

 

I think this is a very good hire honestly. I know people will watch the Georgia game and be like "LOL HE SUCKS" but reality is, he took over Baylor right after one of the worst college scandals in recent memory and made them competitive. He helped turn Temple into a respectable program as well.

Why is the NFL so in love with Matt Rhule - what am I missing?

He is a great leader of men.  That’s something that translates from high school to college to NFL.

      £.   Temple was 2-10 when Rhule was hired.  Two years later they were 10-3.  A year later 11-2.

 

      £.   Baylor was 1-11 when Ruhle was hired.  Two years later they were 11-1.


The fact both programs turned so quickly shows he isn’t simply winning by adding better recruits.  He is taking the old regime’s players and turning them into conference champions.  That speaks to great coaching.  Coughlin loved him when he was on the Giants staff.  This will turn out to be a very good hire for Carolina

   23 hours ago,  Hingle McCringleberrysaid: 

Its crazy, he couldnt hold a very depleted georgia offense and couldnt get anything going against an equally depleted defense in a bowl game. I usually dont hold much stock in a single game, but that was ridiculous.

Baylor really had no business being 11-1 and in the Sugar Bowl. Typical “sum greater than its parts.” I’m not sure about the fit in Carolina but Rhule is a good coach

This. Baylor wasnt 11-1 talent and it showed vs UGA. Honestly it should have been worse than it was. 
 

 

Based on Rhule's track record, Carolina will suck in 2020 and 2021 and then be dangerous in 2022.

Seriously, he's a guy who can win with lesser talent, but that salary seems 50% too high.

Yep. I hate this hire! I think he's gonna be a great NFL HC

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

Why does anyone care how much he is getting paid? I mean anyone. It literally affects nothing.

I mean it doesn’t. But he’s being paid like a top 6 coach in the league and he’s never coached a down of nfl football. I get why people are like wtf but ultimately you’re right, it doesn’t matter. It’s just a matter of perception to some people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersBigD Newbie

PanthersBigD

Posted
Posted

I don't think we'll suck as badly as people fear in 2020. I don't think we'll be in a Super Bowl, or even the playoffs necessarily, but we don't have the dearth of talent that either of his college teams had. This is the NFL. No one has a completely loaded team. We've got a lot of good to great players on both sides of the ball. We've got high draft picks, and let's be real, Tepper didn't just pay this guy 60MM guaranteed to let Hurney overrule his draft choices. 

I would say by mid-season 2020, we'll start seeing Rhule's system, whatever form that takes, begin to mesh and win us some games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Are you starting to warm to the choice to hire Rhule?  I am.

Going to wait and see how the offseason pans out before I make any decisions on my opinion. Right now it just seems like Tepper got a boner for this guy and threw so much money at him he couldn't say no. Who knows how something like that will turn out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...