Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton - Professional Troll


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

Lol. Can't wait until next year's article when he has us picking a kicker in the top ten.

 

Side note.. Newton is probably a troll on here

Kickers are the highest scorers on most every team and they win more walkoff games than QBs do---it is strange that they are not more valued if you think about it.  Some say, "Yeah but they only play 10-12 plays a game."  If that is the argument, then we should not value closers in baseball. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Kickers are the highest scorers on most every team and they win more walkoff games than QBs do---it is strange that they are not more valued if you think about it.  Some say, "Yeah but they only play 10-12 plays a game."  If that is the argument, then we should not value closers in baseball. 

 

So you would take one in the top ten? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Palmetto said:

He also threw 27 Tds

and will starting in the Super Bowl in a week and half

If Allen or Grier  had Jimmy Gs season the huddle would be naming a street after him

 

I agree some would. If we had the play calling and defense the 49ers have I (and other hurdlers the wiser) would rather name streets after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Kickers are the highest scorers on most every team and they win more walkoff games than QBs do---it is strange that they are not more valued if you think about it.  Some say, "Yeah but they only play 10-12 plays a game."  If that is the argument, then we should not value closers in baseball. 

 

Over time there isn't a huge spread in kicker success. Adam Vinitieri is an 84% kicker and will go to the HoF. Graham Gano is/was an 82% kicker. That is one FG a year. Gano wasn't drafted. 80% kickers are a dime a dozen.

Plus they do one thing. The don't have to read offenses, rarely tackle.

Kind of the same reason we don't draft long snappers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tbe said:

I think his life is so dull that he says this stuff to have someone to talk to on Twitter.

 

For real though. Outside of back up QBs, when was the last time a QB “developed” into a starter?

For us. Delhomme. You could make an argument for Aaron Rodgers, and Jimmy G. Mahomes sat behind Alex Smith for a year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Kickers are the highest scorers on most every team and they win more walkoff games than QBs do---it is strange that they are not more valued if you think about it.  Some say, "Yeah but they only play 10-12 plays a game."  If that is the argument, then we should not value closers in baseball. 

 

I think it's mostly that it's very hard to distinguish quality amongst them. Among kickers good enough to play in the NFL, plus the next couple dozen guys ALMOST good enough, statistical performance is remarkably random. 

It's an elite specialized skill, but among the (say) hundred or so guys in the world good enough to do it, it's damn near impossible to say who's better. And if someone's better this year, they won't be next year. So why race to get one guy over another guy by drafting higher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...