Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Schools are still open in Sweden and the number of children died with or because Covid-19 is... 

"Infants" 0

0-10 year olds: O

10-20 year olds: 4 

20-30: 4

Our outbreak is still merely concentrated around Stockholm and some eastern and middle regions of Sweden also have a notable number if cases.

If open schools would have this severe impact, shouldn't the rest of Sweden then also have an explosion of new cases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kass said:

Schools are still open in Sweden and the number of children died with or because Covid-19 is... 

"Infants" 0

0-10 year olds: O

10-20 year olds: 4 

20-30: 4

Our outbreak is still merely concentrated around Stockholm and some eastern and middle regions of Sweden also have a notable number if cases.

If open schools would have this severe impact, shouldn't the rest of Sweden then also have an explosion of new cases. 

Sweden is going to be a very interesting case study on how to handle this. If their numbers don't explode over the coming weeks then maybe other countries need to use their approach as a guideline.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sweden is going to be a very interesting case study on how to handle this. If their numbers don't explode over the coming weeks then maybe other countries need to use their approach as a guideline.

Today one agency announced that they will look into the numbers and secure the data. They did do a quick dive into it, saying it looked about right but now they will go through every case again.

Hopefully a few other countries also are up to the task. 

I tried to find the numbers for the US but it's a jungle. I couldn't find any data that included when the person actually died. There are alot of delayed reporting so it's hard to predict trends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sweden is going to be a very interesting case study on how to handle this. If their numbers don't explode over the coming weeks then maybe other countries need to use their approach as a guideline.

Yeah, I feel like there are going to be two different prediction models and response protocols in the end.

1) How does the virus spread in densely populated areas (NYC, Jersey, Italy) and what response is appropriate.

2) How does the virus spread in less dense populations (Sweden, much of the US) and what response is appropriate.

Edited by Tbe
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sweden is going to be a very interesting case study on how to handle this. If their numbers don't explode over the coming weeks then maybe other countries need to use their approach as a guideline.

well recently their numbers have been going up. But its still to early to see the true impact of their approach. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sweden is going to be a very interesting case study on how to handle this. If their numbers don't explode over the coming weeks then maybe other countries need to use their approach as a guideline.

Sweden doesn't know what the word "exponential" means. They're right up there with China in misinformation.

Critics question Swedish approach as coronavirus death toll reaches 1,000

Quote

SWEDEN has recorded its highest number of coronavirus deaths in one day after refusing to lockdown like the rest of Europe.

The Scandinavian country's death toll hit 1,203 with a record 170 fatalities reported in the last 24 hours.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We'll never truly know, but if I was hazarding a guess it's probably in the 1% range. That's still 10x deadlier than the common flu.

That's gonna be the biggest problem with this as estimates are all we're going to have to go on. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 332nd said:

That's gonna be the biggest problem with this as estimates are all we're going to have to go on. 

I think the coming antibody tests will provide a much clearer picture and probably enough of a picture to produce a decent SWAG at least. Right now we don't even have that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...