Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, GoPanthers123 said:

Made in China virus.  They have to have a vaccine then, you need control over who gets infected if it’s a bio weapon.

Experts are very confident it's not a biological weapon. They're very confident it's a naturally evolved virus. They aren't certain that it didn't escape from a lab. There's a lab in Wuhan only a few miles away from that wet market that focuses on virus collection, sampling, and studying and there are some red flags about just how quickly the Chinese were to blame the wet market when there have been no shortage of concerns from virologists around the globe about those very wet markets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Experts are very confident it's not a biological weapon. They're very confident it's a naturally evolved virus. They aren't certain that it didn't escape from a lab. There's a lab in Wuhan only a few miles away from that wet market that focuses on virus collection, sampling, and studying and there are some red flags about just how quickly the Chinese were to blame the wet market when there have been no shortage of concerns from virologists around the globe about those very wet markets. 

It’s based on February 3rd posted research by Chinese researchers lol.  There is currently an ongoing investigation.

A6E20A9F-390F-4416-9571-20AD83246DDE.thumb.jpeg.3cd2795db004deb66b39222966e0a3cf.jpeg7616512A-E753-47F6-9D59-C5094BE2277B.thumb.jpeg.4a6891fb2b17aa703c03eef5ca99214a.jpeg
 

Here’s the today news not from Chinese nationals.

Coronavirus: Is there any evidence for lab release theory? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52318539

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It has been independently sequenced numerous times by numerous countries. How do you think we know that the NY outbreak primarily sources to European origin?

There are multiple stories.  Washington Post just reported researchers believe it was a leak.  I mean, common... Wuhan has institute specializing in Coronavirus SARS virus from bats to humans.  We have a SARS Coronavirus explosion from bats to humans in Wuhan.  In 2018, There were multiple safety violations by that institute and warning of SARS pandemic was sent to Washington DC.  And you tell me it’s natural?

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

There are multiple stories.  Washington Post just reported researchers believe it was a leak.  I mean, common... Wuhan has institute specializing in Coronavirus SARS virus from bats to humans.  We have a SARS Coronavirus explosion from bats to humans in Wuhan.  In 2018, There were multiple safety violations by that institute and warning of SARS pandemic was sent to Washington DC.  And you tell me it’s natural?

A leak is definitely possible. A leak does not preclude natural origins. That's what the experts are pretty damn certain about - the virus isn't bioengineered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe I just read somewhere that the Rams don't do Top 30 Visits. I mean, it makes sense from the standpoint of trying to keep information close to the vest.
    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
×
×
  • Create New...