Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Common sense can triumph. Simple truthful information is what people need and understand most. Shutdowns need to be controlled by counties/cities rather than a blanket code for an entire state. Too bad we didn't do this from the beginning.

Nope. That’s how it was in Utah. They did it different like that. Some counties just didn’t give a fug. As of today, the mayor came in and said fug it, masks are mandatory everywhere except your personal house. Thank god.

 

Common sense absolutely cannot triumph for the simple fact for some people it does not exist.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Meanwhile, in actual coronavirus news, California reinstitutes stay at home order after rise in new cases.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/california-coronavirus-state-passes-200-183023480.html

I don't agree with this. IMO, this is not the right approach given what we now know about this virus. Masks and social distancing is the right way to go.

What I haven't understood through all of this is why we haven't done a better job of protecting the high risk.  Even with the total shutdown you still had a tremendous amount of high risk people working in "essential" business.

Seems like if you did a better job of removing those from the equation you could let everyone else go back to work/play normally and your net deaths would possible go down, especially with mask and social distancing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AU-panther said:

What I haven't understood through all of this is why we haven't done a better job of protecting the high risk.  Even with the total shutdown you still had a tremendous amount of high risk people working in "essential" business.

Seems like if you did a better job of removing those from the equation you could let everyone else go back to work/play normally and your net deaths would possible go down, especially with mask and social distancing.

 

 

lock down specifically targets the at risk population

so that's not just your obviously immuno compromised, that's > 65, obese, a smoker, or diabetic.

who does that population sound like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I could Google it. But has anyone ever done the stats to see how much it costs each person individually? 328.2 million in the US. I'd hope they all pay taxes. SO ... break it down. How much does all that stuff cost ... me. I'm not arguing that stuff doesn't get paid by us, I'm saying it's miniscule. Sort of like when someone gets mad at a cop: I PAY YOUR SALARY!

you dont say dave chappelle GIF

328 million people is an incorrect number for federal tax payers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/06/08/how-iceland-beat-the-coronavirus?utm_campaign=falcon&utm_source=facebook&mbid=social_facebook&utm_brand=tny&utm_social-type=owned&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwAR3D6mO8RJ4pYeW23mLe5Pfs9D7kyJ8GFefgjEfaO1t2JDwUnEj6w9Z1bYE&fbclid=IwAR3lSwg7TETrBXo9D1bT65dZs9U78Gp7jVqGJ5tyfu44qyCo-gjInSc8oik&fbclid=IwAR1symYAt2Bu6CzRjlzSQLEe-36mmOuLnjAcyI9Qb9XzP9WPGjPjwbKBbTM
 

Quote

 

How Iceland Beat the Coronavirus
The country didn’t just manage to flatten the curve; it virtually eliminated it.

“We started our preparations long before the first case tested positive here in Iceland,” the country’s Prime Minister said. “And it was very clear from the beginning that this was something that should be led by experts—by scientific and medical experts.”

 

Crazy.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

What I haven't understood through all of this is why we haven't done a better job of protecting the high risk.  Even with the total shutdown you still had a tremendous amount of high risk people working in "essential" business.

Seems like if you did a better job of removing those from the equation you could let everyone else go back to work/play normally and your net deaths would possible go down, especially with mask and social distancing.

 

 

I tried talking like this 300 pages ago, it won't work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I can't quite recall who it was that criticized Obama for playing much less golf. Name is escaping me....The President leads by example.  Playing golf when the nation is dying is not the vibe one might expect a leader to project.  It demonstrates that his focus is going to be on chasing a white ball around a manicured landscape instead of being on the pandemic.  Look at his twitter today--he is trying to get the people tearing down statues targeted. He is promoting a group shouting "White Power."  Was he on the golf course when he tweeted these things?  You are right-it does not matter.

I loathe Trump, don't really care what he does or doesn't do.  I just think some people have some idea that the president gets time off from being president.  He doesn't. 

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care that Trump golfs. He can do presidential stuff anywhere. I don't care that he looks funny or screws up drinking water.

But when I golf I usually make sure I do my job first as a father and business owner. 

This week, trump retweeted a video with someone saying "white power," petitioned the SCOTUS to get rid of Obamacare DURING A PANDEMIC, and was found out have known about Russia putting hits out on American soldiers. That's not all he did. And the fact that he profits off of his own golf outings is slimy at best. Hannity would have had a week long special on it.

It would be like that one inept employee skipping out for golf at noon when a critical project is due at 5:00.

Obama did his job. He was allowed to go on holiday and golf. Trump is a joke.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

I don't care that Trump golfs. He can do presidential stuff anywhere. I don't care that he looks funny or screws up drinking water.

But when I golf I usually make sure I do my job first as a father and business owner. 

This week, trump retweeted a video with someone saying "white power," petitioned the SCOTUS to get rid of Obamacare DURING A PANDEMIC, and was found out have known about Russia putting hits out on American soldiers. That's not all he did. And the fact that he profits off of his own golf outings is slimy at best. Hannity would have had a week long special on it.

It would be like that one inept employee skipping out for golf at noon when a critical project is due at 5:00.

Obama did his job. He was allowed to go on holiday and golf. Trump is a joke.

Alot of things get accomplished when playing golf.  It's always gotten a bad rap.  I've gotten more business done on a golf course than I ever have at a business lunch or dinner, for instance.

However if someone wants to be one of the dummies calling someone out for golfing, they deserve to be called out for golfing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

when im president im going to have an oly platform and assault bike in the oval office

just sitting there crushing cleans while on video chat with like the president of France

Like Terrell Owen's in his driveway!

Edited by Wes21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AU-panther said:

What I haven't understood through all of this is why we haven't done a better job of protecting the high risk.  Even with the total shutdown you still had a tremendous amount of high risk people working in "essential" business.

Seems like if you did a better job of removing those from the equation you could let everyone else go back to work/play normally and your net deaths would possible go down, especially with mask and social distancing.

 

 

Because you can't lock up the sick, the elderly, people with health issues, etc. just because you want to "play normally". That's not the way the world works. You want to go back to work? You want to play? WEAR A MASK. If everyone wore a mask from the start we wouldn't be where we are. But the youth, and the anti-mask people have kept the pandemic afloat.

Simple question: If someone said, yes, you can go back to work. Yes, you can go to the club, and the bar. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO is wear a mask. Would you wear a mask? So odd that some people still wouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Happy Panther said:

Cuomo has said anyone from an at risk state that comes to NY must quarantine for 14 days. Impossible to enforce. Meanwhile, a girl on Long Island came back from a trip to Florida ... positive. Stupidly went to a party and now 85 teens have COVID. The number of people those 85 have come in contact with is pretty big I'd bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...