Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Just saw a report that Ezekiel Elliot tested positive. 

If more of their stars start testing positive, could have a dramatic impact on the NFL season.  

Wow.

When did he test positive? 

I think Brian Jones was first to test positve back in mid-April, was Zeke about the same time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

Some people are going to be genuinely upset when we get back to normal life.  Like, really pissed off.

For them, it all depends on the election.

If there is a D in the White House, one side will all of a sudden become pragmatic, the other side will suddenly start pointing out the administrations grievous mistakes.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, chknwing said:

This may be the dumbest thing Trump has said to date.  On the increase in covid19 cases.  

"If we stop testing right now, we'd have very few cases, if any,"  - Donald Trump

It is stupid, but Trump has said a lot of stupid things.  He has so many to choose from, not sure if this even makes the top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A vaccine by next spring would still be unbelievably quick. Ebola currently holds the record and that's still 5 years.

While Ebola is very lethal, it doesn't spread this easily and did't spread to every place on the globe.  This is a 'all hands on deck' situation.  Secondly, SARS is known virus.  While this particular strain is novel, the family has been studied for a while, so it's not like they are starting from scratch with a complete enigma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

While Ebola is very lethal, it doesn't spread this easily and did't spread to every place on the globe.  This is a 'all hands on deck' situation.  Secondly, SARS is known virus.  While this particular strain is novel, the family has been studied for a while, so it's not like they are starting from scratch with a complete enigma.

All this is accurate, but it's the trial phase of vaccine development that takes the longest and there's really no way to responsibly speed up that process. A vaccine by next spring would still be producing a vaccine in a year and a half which is less than a third of the time the fastest vaccine has ever been developed. I think it's possible, but I think the people banking on a vaccine prior to the coming cold/flu season in the fall are just not being realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stirs said:

For them, it all depends on the election.

If there is a D in the White House, one side will all of a sudden become pragmatic, the other side will suddenly start pointing out the administrations grievous mistakes.

I definitely appreciate that idea as well.  Half of my Facebook timeline will change its tune if there is a D in office.  But I was moreso talking about the people who are so personally vested in this.  They really don't care who's in office as much.  Its like they need this thing for their soul or something, its weird.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

All this is accurate, but it's the trial phase of vaccine development that takes the longest and there's really no way to responsibly speed up that process. A vaccine by next spring would still be producing a vaccine in a year and a half which is less than a third of the time the fastest vaccine has ever been developed. I think it's possible, but I think the people banking on a vaccine prior to the coming cold/flu season in the fall are just not being realistic.

I'm more concerned for our economy and people's physical/mental well being.  I'm not personally banking on a vaccine.  Truth be known, the virus will most likely mutate into a less lethal form or burn itself out before a vaccine is readily available.  However short of a vaccine, the hysteria will not settle down.  As stated earlier, I probably wouldn't even get a shot. I'm hopeful for a vaccine so certain people that are still hunkered down in 'bubble mode' can get on with their lives.  The secondary death toll may never fully be known (suicides, refusal of medical attention for treatable conditions and unable to get medical attention).  I would venture to say it could be up to 1/3 of all "related" coronavirus deaths.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2020 at 12:41 PM, Wes21 said:

Per capita is a warped way of looking at it, I agree.

How many days has it been now?  May 25 to June 16? 22 days and counting.  Minnesota has shown no spike.  New York is opening.  Georgia is still plugging along.

Are we ready to see it yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stirs said:

For them, it all depends on the election.

If there is a D in the White House, one side will all of a sudden become pragmatic, the other side will suddenly start pointing out the administrations grievous mistakes.

I like how you basically point out that your own political bias is the reason you assume it's political.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

How many days has it been now?  May 25 to June 16? 22 days and counting.  Minnesota has shown no spike.  New York is opening.  Georgia is still plugging along.

Are we ready to see it yet?

I still think NYC screwed it up for everyone. Also giving increased incentives to treat coronavirus patients, I think the system got scammed....BADLY.  You can't look at NYC death figures and then look at every other city/state and say it looks normal.  Just dismissing it because of their large population is being very short-sided.  I would like to say their incompetence was due to ignorance, but unfortunately it was more than likely malicious.  Washington State/Seattle never got that bad and they were ground zero for the virus.  Chicago, LA, Detroit, DC, Dallas, Miami...this list goes on and on, none of these large cities experienced the same rate of death, so large populations isn't the main factor here.   Greed and politicization is at the core or this.  I really hope De Blasio gets thrown in jail once exposed.   Cuomo is culpable too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I still think NYC screwed it up for everyone. Also giving increased incentives to treat coronavirus patients, I think the system got scammed....BADLY.  You can't look at NYC death figures and then look at every other city/state and say it looks normal.  Just dismissing it because of their large population is being very short-sided.  I would like to say their incompetence was due to ignorance, but unfortunately it was more than likely malicious.  Washington State/Seattle never got that bad and they were ground zero for the virus.  Chicago, LA, Detroit, DC, Dallas, Miami...this list goes on and on, none of these large cities experienced the same rate of death, so large populations isn't the main factor here.   Greed and politicization is at the core or this.  I really hope De Blasio gets thrown in jail once exposed.   Cuomo is culpable too.

Do you believe 9/11 was an inside job?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
×
×
  • Create New...